2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predator interference effects on biological control: The “paradox” of the generalist predator revisited

Abstract: Abstract. An interesting conundrum in biological control questions the efficiency of generalist predators as biological control agents. Theory suggests, generalist predators are poor agents for biological control, primarily due to mutual interference. However field evidence shows they are actually quite effective in regulating pest densities. In this work we provide a plausible answer to this paradox. We analyze a three species model, where a generalist top predator is introduced into an ecosystem as a biologi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is achieved via Theorem . Although versions similar to this were simulated in , no rigorous proof was given. To this end, it would be interesting to explore the spatially explicit version, with the inclusion of time delay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved via Theorem . Although versions similar to this were simulated in , no rigorous proof was given. To this end, it would be interesting to explore the spatially explicit version, with the inclusion of time delay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a future direction in modelling the crab-mussel-epibiont interaction, we would also like to examine interference effects [19,21,20]. This effect has often seen to be stabilising [34], and thus modeling interference among the crab population, at high epibiont density is also realistic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al ( 2005 ) studied the dynamical behavior of a Holling I prey-predator model with mutual interference in the case of pest-free periodic solutions. Parshad et al ( 2016 ) stated that mutual interference between species can cause population explosion and mathematically termed this as finite time blow up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the study complied with self and cross-diffusion patterns. Upadhyay et al ( 2013 ) studied dynamics induced by the predator interference with generalist predator and Parsad et al ( 2016 ) extended this model and pointed out some other properties of predator interference. They also showed the spatial chaos and Turing instability for the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%