2008
DOI: 10.1890/07-1220.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predator Diversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Density Modifies the Effect of Resource Partitioning

Abstract: The link between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning is now well established, but the challenge remains to develop a mechanistic understanding of observed effects. Predator-prey interactions provide an opportunity to examine the role of resource partitioning, thought to be a principal mediator of biodiversity-function relationships. To date, interactions between multiple predators and their prey have typically been investigated in simplified agricultural systems with limited scope for resource partitioning.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
117
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
8
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we provide contrary evidence that diverse protists mixtures substantially reduced bacterial cell numbers ( Supplementary Figure 2). This is further supported by theory (Thebault andLoreau, 2003, 2006), suggesting that increasing generalist predator richness may have a greater effect on prey abundance than increasing specialist predator richness, as well as by field and laboratory studies (Gamfeldt et al, 2005;Byrnes et al, 2006;Griffin et al, 2008) showing that higher consumer or predator biomass because of increasing richness concomitantly resulted in reduced prey biomass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Here, we provide contrary evidence that diverse protists mixtures substantially reduced bacterial cell numbers ( Supplementary Figure 2). This is further supported by theory (Thebault andLoreau, 2003, 2006), suggesting that increasing generalist predator richness may have a greater effect on prey abundance than increasing specialist predator richness, as well as by field and laboratory studies (Gamfeldt et al, 2005;Byrnes et al, 2006;Griffin et al, 2008) showing that higher consumer or predator biomass because of increasing richness concomitantly resulted in reduced prey biomass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Predator diversity not only stabilized predation, but also elevated its mean strength to a level that could not be matched by either species alone at equal density, implying that extinction of either of these predators would weaken top-down control of Littoraria. Enhancement of predation with predator diversity can result from a range of mechanisms [2], but several lines of evidence suggest that in the present study it resulted from weaker interspecific compared with intraspecific competition-the hallmark of species complementarity [11,12]. First, the strong densitydependent suppression of predation rate that occurred within single-species treatments was not apparent when species were combined (figure 2c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Moreover, the relation of consumer diversity and resource exploitation applies to specialized consumers (Finke and Snyder 2008) and high consumer densities (Griffin et al. 2008). In temperate climates, postdispersal seed predation by invertebrates is less dependent on specialized consumers and generally driven by a diverse consumer community (Lundgren et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%