Key points:1. Delirium is a major public health concern, and research on pathophysiological mechanisms is urgently needed.2. Some biochemical changes in the brain are to an extent reflected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and in recent years there has been a blossoming of studies examining CSF as a method of studying the pathophysiology of delirium.3. The 22 studies identified in this review reveal a small but growing literature, in which many of the important hypotheses in delirium pathogenesis have been examined, but from which few firm conclusions can currently be drawn. Nevertheless, the overall interpretation of the literature supports the vulnerable brain concept. 4. A concerted effort is now required to standardise several aspects of the methodology and reporting of these studies, in order to advance this highly promising direction in delirium research.
Funding: The Norwegian Association for Public Health
AbstractObjective In recent years there has been a blossoming of studies examining cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a method of studying the pathophysiology of delirium. We systematically reviewed the literature for CSF studies in delirium and provide here a summary of the implications for our understanding of delirium pathophysiology. We also summarise the methods used for CSF analysis and discuss challenges and implications for future studies.Methods In this systematic review we screened MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed and the Cochrane Library for articles on CSF biomarkers in delirium, published to September 3 rd 2016. Studies were required to use DSM or ICD criteria for delirium, or a validated tool. We excluded case reports. There were no other restrictions on study type.
ResultsWe identified 3280 articles from our initial search and 22 articles were included in this review. All studies were prospective, including over 400 patients with delirium and 700 controls. More than 70 different biomarkers were studied. Studies could not be compared with each other for meta-analysis because of their heterogeneity, and varied widely in their risk of bias and quality assessments.
ConclusionsThe 22 studies identified in this review reveal a small but growing literature, in which many of the important hypotheses in delirium pathogenesis have been examined, but from which few firm conclusions can currently be drawn. Nevertheless, the overall interpretation of the literature supports the vulnerable brain concept, that is that biomarker 4 evidence of for example Alzheimer's disease pathology and/or neuroinflammation is associated with delirium.