2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precipitation in the Mg-carbonate system—effects of temperature and CO2 pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
386
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 415 publications
(401 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(29 reference statements)
12
386
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4a). The gain itself is related to the formation of magnesite MgCO 3 as shown by Bearat et al (2002) and/or a series of crystalwater-bearing Mg carbonates (Hänchen et al 2008). The main weight loss is due to a combination of dehydroxylation of remaining brucite and decarbonisation of magnesite (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4a). The gain itself is related to the formation of magnesite MgCO 3 as shown by Bearat et al (2002) and/or a series of crystalwater-bearing Mg carbonates (Hänchen et al 2008). The main weight loss is due to a combination of dehydroxylation of remaining brucite and decarbonisation of magnesite (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a weight gain below the onset of the brucite dehydroxylation under inert N 2 atmosphere. A reaction involving hydrated carbonate species is also possible and would complicate the reaction sequence (Hänchen et al 2008). For the chosen heating rates, it is impossible to achieve a completion of the carbonation reaction (Bearat et al 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it becomes logical to surmise that the dolomite problem and the magnesite problem probably share the same root, that is, the difficulty to incorporate unhydrated magnesium ions into carbonate from aqueous solutions without appealing to temperature and/or pressure changes. Given the 50% abundance of dolomites in the world's carbonate reservoirs (6, 17) and the potential of magnesium carbonate for carbon sequestration (18,19), as well as the critical role of Mg in carbonate biomineralization (20)(21)(22), it is safe to assume that scientific interests in the Ca-Mg-CO 3 system will remain for years to come.Aqueous 24). Nesquehonite is the most commonly formed phase under low temperature and pressure [e.g., 25°C and a pCO 2 of ∼10 −2 atm (25-27)], whereas hydromagnesite and other basic forms become dominant in an intermediate temperature range [e.g., 40-60°C (28-30)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aqueous 24). Nesquehonite is the most commonly formed phase under low temperature and pressure [e.g., 25°C and a pCO 2 of ∼10 −2 atm (25-27)], whereas hydromagnesite and other basic forms become dominant in an intermediate temperature range [e.g., 40-60°C (28-30)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, magnesite precipitation is so slow that it would likely also control the rate of magnesite formation at the expense of serpentine. An additional complicating factor is that the rate of magnesite nucleation at similar temperatures is also slow (Giammar et al, 2005;Hanchen et al, 2008). In fact, magnesium carbonate precipitation often does not occur until the saturation state has reached levels at which hydromagnesite (Mg 5 (CO 3 ) 4 (OH) 2 ×H 2 O) or other mixed carbonate-hydrate phases form.…”
Section: Serpentinite Carbonation At Linnajavrimentioning
confidence: 99%