Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Pre-operative traction for fractures of the proximal femur in adults
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
29
5
3
2
Citation Types
0
25
0
0
Year Published
Range
2000
20002025
2025Publication Types
Select...
29
5
2
Relationship
0
36
Authors
Journals
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
References 13 publications
0
25
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In agreement with Parker and Handoll (2005) other issues need to be addressed to determine whether traction may be an advantage, such as whether traction is beneficial for different types of hip fracture. Attention should also focus upon when patient's pain is at its highest, and whether traction may be beneficial for particular time periods only.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In agreement with Parker and Handoll (2005) other issues need to be addressed to determine whether traction may be an advantage, such as whether traction is beneficial for different types of hip fracture. Attention should also focus upon when patient's pain is at its highest, and whether traction may be beneficial for particular time periods only.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, we found a systematic review of 7 high-quality studies (1,271 participants) that reported no benefits for traction use. 12 There were no differences in pain with or without the use of traction on either the first (RR =1.14 (0.89, 1.46)) or second (RR =1.02 (0.74, 1.41)) postoperative day. 12 One trial indicated that analgesic use increased with preoperative traction use (RR =1.78 (1.16, 2.7)).…”
Section: Preoperative Care
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…12 There were no differences in pain with or without the use of traction on either the first (RR =1.14 (0.89, 1.46)) or second (RR =1.02 (0.74, 1.41)) postoperative day. 12 One trial indicated that analgesic use increased with preoperative traction use (RR =1.78 (1.16, 2.7)). 13 Further, traction did not improve the ease of fracture reduction (RR =1.02 (0.34, 3.00)).…”
Section: Preoperative Care
mentioning
confidence: 82%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Recently, Parker & Handoll [14] published the updated results of a meta-analysis of eight randomized trials, including 1,349 predominantly elderly patients. The review update resulted in no important change of results or conclusions: overall, no evidence for a beneficial effect on preoperative traction was provided, nor on relief of pain, fracture reduction, quality of reduction, and time of surgery.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In agreement with Parker and Handoll (2005) other issues need to be addressed to determine whether traction may be an advantage, such as whether traction is beneficial for different types of hip fracture. Attention should also focus upon when patient's pain is at its highest, and whether traction may be beneficial for particular time periods only.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, we found a systematic review of 7 high-quality studies (1,271 participants) that reported no benefits for traction use. 12 There were no differences in pain with or without the use of traction on either the first (RR =1.14 (0.89, 1.46)) or second (RR =1.02 (0.74, 1.41)) postoperative day. 12 One trial indicated that analgesic use increased with preoperative traction use (RR =1.78 (1.16, 2.7)).…”
Section: Preoperative Care
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…12 There were no differences in pain with or without the use of traction on either the first (RR =1.14 (0.89, 1.46)) or second (RR =1.02 (0.74, 1.41)) postoperative day. 12 One trial indicated that analgesic use increased with preoperative traction use (RR =1.78 (1.16, 2.7)). 13 Further, traction did not improve the ease of fracture reduction (RR =1.02 (0.34, 3.00)).…”
Section: Preoperative Care
mentioning
confidence: 82%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Recently, Parker & Handoll [14] published the updated results of a meta-analysis of eight randomized trials, including 1,349 predominantly elderly patients. The review update resulted in no important change of results or conclusions: overall, no evidence for a beneficial effect on preoperative traction was provided, nor on relief of pain, fracture reduction, quality of reduction, and time of surgery.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In agreement with Parker and Handoll (2005) other issues need to be addressed to determine whether traction may be an advantage, such as whether traction is beneficial for different types of hip fracture. Attention should also focus upon when patient's pain is at its highest, and whether traction may be beneficial for particular time periods only.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, we found a systematic review of 7 high-quality studies (1,271 participants) that reported no benefits for traction use. 12 There were no differences in pain with or without the use of traction on either the first (RR =1.14 (0.89, 1.46)) or second (RR =1.02 (0.74, 1.41)) postoperative day. 12 One trial indicated that analgesic use increased with preoperative traction use (RR =1.78 (1.16, 2.7)).…”
Section: Preoperative Care
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…12 There were no differences in pain with or without the use of traction on either the first (RR =1.14 (0.89, 1.46)) or second (RR =1.02 (0.74, 1.41)) postoperative day. 12 One trial indicated that analgesic use increased with preoperative traction use (RR =1.78 (1.16, 2.7)). 13 Further, traction did not improve the ease of fracture reduction (RR =1.02 (0.34, 3.00)).…”
Section: Preoperative Care
mentioning
confidence: 82%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Recently, Parker & Handoll [14] published the updated results of a meta-analysis of eight randomized trials, including 1,349 predominantly elderly patients. The review update resulted in no important change of results or conclusions: overall, no evidence for a beneficial effect on preoperative traction was provided, nor on relief of pain, fracture reduction, quality of reduction, and time of surgery.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%