Practice of oxygen use in anesthesiology – a survey of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care

Abstract

Background Oxygen is one of the most commonly used drugs by anesthesiologists. The World Health Organization (WHO) gave recommendations regarding perioperative oxygen administration, but the practice of oxygen use in anesthesia, critical emergency, and intensive care medicine remains unclear. Methods We conducted an online survey among members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC). The questionnaire consisted of 46 queries appraising the perioperative period, emergency medicine and in the intensive care, knowledge about current recommendations by the WHO, oxygen toxicity, and devices for supplemental oxygen therapy. Results Seven hundred ninety-eight ESAIC members (2.1% of all ESAIC members) completed the survey. Most respondents were board-certified and worked in hospitals with > 500 beds. The majority affirmed that they do not use specific protocols for oxygen administration. WHO recommendations are unknown to 42% of respondents, known but not followed by 14%, and known and followed by 24% of them. Respondents prefer inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) ≥80% during induction and emergence from anesthesia, but intraoperatively < 60% for maintenance, and higher FiO2 in patients with diseased than non-diseased lungs. Postoperative oxygen therapy is prescribed more commonly according to peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), but shortage of devices still limits monitoring. When monitoring is used, SpO2 ≤ 95% is often targeted. In critical emergency medicine, oxygen is used frequently in patients aged ≥80 years, or presenting with respiratory distress, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. In the intensive care unit, oxygen is mostly targeted at 96%, especially in patients with pulmonary diseases. Conclusions The current practice of perioperative oxygen therapy among respondents does not follow WHO recommendations or current evidence, and access to postoperative monitoring devices impairs the individualization of oxygen therapy. Further research and additional teaching about use of oxygen are necessary.

Effects of mechanical ventilation on the interstitial extracellular matrix in healthy lungs and lungs affected by acute respiratory distress syndrome: a narrative review

“…Time-controlled adaptive ventilation, compared with volume-controlled ventilation, led to less ECM damage due to better distribution of transpulmonary pressure [ 104 ]. With assisted mechanical ventilation, Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA), variable pressure support ventilation (Noisy PSV), and conventional pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) resulted in similar lung injuries and incidence of asynchrony [ 102 ]. Noisy PSV led to lower PCIII expression than NAVA and PCV, which may be associated with different lung distribution of stress and strain.…”

Perioperative oxygenation—what's the stress?

“…A survey of members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care reported that only 24% of the 798 respondents knew of and followed the WHO's recommendations on perioperative oxygenation. 37 …”

When does the oxygen cease to be a remedy?

“…Hiperventilacija može skratiti ovo vreme. Preoksigenacija utiče na odlaganje arterijske desaturacije oksihemoglobina tokom perioda apneje (za vreme intubacije traheje) i produžava vreme desaturacije sa jednog minuta tokom disanja sobnog vazduha na 6,9 minuta tokom udisanja 100% kiseonika 5 . Kod pacijenata sa smanjenim kapacitetom za transport kiseonika brže dolazi do desaturacije u toku apneje.…”