2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Tools to Implement Massive Parallel Pyrosequencing of PCR Products in Next Generation Molecular Diagnostics

Abstract: Despite improvements in terms of sequence quality and price per basepair, Sanger sequencing remains restricted to screening of individual disease genes. The development of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technologies heralded an era in which molecular diagnostics for multigenic disorders becomes reality. Here, we outline different PCR amplification based strategies for the screening of a multitude of genes in a patient cohort. We performed a thorough evaluation in terms of set-up, coverage and sequencing v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main disadvantage of pyrosequencing relative to other NGS technologies is the accuracy of length determination in homopolymers. 12,17,21 In pyrosequencing, the light-intensity signal observed in each cycle is proportional to the actual number of incorporated nucleotides, which is the base for homopolymer length calling. The accuracy of this method decreases with homopolymer length, which may eventually generate artefactual insertions and deletions in long homopolymers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of pyrosequencing relative to other NGS technologies is the accuracy of length determination in homopolymers. 12,17,21 In pyrosequencing, the light-intensity signal observed in each cycle is proportional to the actual number of incorporated nucleotides, which is the base for homopolymer length calling. The accuracy of this method decreases with homopolymer length, which may eventually generate artefactual insertions and deletions in long homopolymers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variants were selected to be called when Ͼ15% in Ͼ15 total reads for the base being interrogated. A 15% mutation filter was chosen because a heterozygous variant had been statistically determined to be identified 99.995% of the time when there was 30-fold coverage (23). Regions with less than 30-fold coverage were analyzed by Sanger sequencing.…”
Section: Ngs Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, we can confidently state that variants with an allelic ratio of o15% are false positives (somatic analyses excluded), a finding in accordance with those of other platforms. 19,20 Depth of coverage is another prominent point to consider, because the lower the depth, the higher the risk of missing a variant, by sequencing failure and/or bioinformatics filtering. Conversely, the Streamlined ion torrent PGM diagnostics J Tarabeux et al higher the depth, the higher the probability of discriminating false positives (ie, random errors) from true positives.…”
Section: Bioinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%