2008
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2008.2001399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Poissonian-Gaussian Noise Modeling and Fitting for Single-Image Raw-Data

Abstract: Abstract-We present a simple and usable noise model for the raw-data of digital imaging sensors. This signal-dependent noise model, which gives the pointwise standard-deviation of the noise as a function of the expectation of the pixel raw-data output, is composed of a Poissonian part, modeling the photon sensing, and Gaussian part, for the remaining stationary disturbancies in the output data. We further explicitly take into account the clipping of the data (over-and under-exposure), faithfully reproducing th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
667
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 752 publications
(708 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
667
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, our non-local transform decomposition can be embedded within the estimation algorithm for heteroskedastic observations [7], which is relevant for modeling dealing with raw data from digital imaging sensors. Let us however mention that, when facing heteroskedasticity, to avoid additional bias the block sizes cannot be arbitrarily large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, our non-local transform decomposition can be embedded within the estimation algorithm for heteroskedastic observations [7], which is relevant for modeling dealing with raw data from digital imaging sensors. Let us however mention that, when facing heteroskedasticity, to avoid additional bias the block sizes cannot be arbitrarily large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local smoothness or fast spectral decay of natural images are typical hypotheses to make the estimation possible, e.g., by measuring the noise statistics on some homogenous patches [1] or on the highestfrequency portion of the image spectrum [4], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, an additive random term modeling the effect of noise has to be added in (1) [20]. We come back to the noisy case in Sect.…”
Section: Spectral Characterization Of Cfasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the AWGN assumption is not met; real noise is more accurately modeled as the sum of Gaussian and Poissonian noises [20]. Moreover, the pixel values are gamma corrected with respect to the photon counts output by the sensor [29] and this step of tone mapping modifies the noise characteristics.…”
Section: B Behavior In the Presence Of Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation