2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2015.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power system reconfiguration in a radial distribution network for reducing losses and to improve voltage profile using modified plant growth simulation algorithm with Distributed Generation (DG)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
86
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The 33‐bus 11‐kV system was composed of one to 32 sectional lines (closed switches) and 33 to 37 tie lines (open switches). The total real power load demand was 3715 kW, and reactive power load demand was 2300 kVAr.…”
Section: Simulation and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 33‐bus 11‐kV system was composed of one to 32 sectional lines (closed switches) and 33 to 37 tie lines (open switches). The total real power load demand was 3715 kW, and reactive power load demand was 2300 kVAr.…”
Section: Simulation and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penetration level of DGs' capacity and the reconfiguration scheme have to be selected in such a way so that the voltage stability margin after reconfiguration would be more than before reconfiguration (15).…”
Section: Stability Margin Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13] Esmaeili et al 14 propose a multi-objective framework for simultaneous network reconfiguration and power allocation of DGs in distribution networks. In Rajarm et al, 15 a modified plant growth simulation algorithm is proposed that considers DGs in the process. The objective function of this paper is reducing the power losses and improving the voltage profile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, some researches suggest the minimum limit in distribution networks to be 0.90 p.u. as given in [20]. It is also important to mention that the reason for being not so useful in case 1 is that it has few instances when the load is higher than that of nominal load value for which the optimal sizes were calculated.…”
Section: ) Static Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%