This commentary addresses the hypothesis that empathy is a tool for embodiment and skillful performance in the presentation of opera and art song. It discusses the need to clearly and effectively define the term "empathy," and considers research from acting and theatre that speaks directly to how embodiment occurs in vocal performance, when that performance is attached to a character specifically. It concludes with some additional acting exercises singers may find useful.Submitted 2014 September 26; accepted 2014 October 28.
KEYWORDS: empathy, theory of mind, acting, vocal performance, operaWHERE do great performances come from? This question, in any performative art, whether music, dance, or acting, has almost as many answers as scholars. The question taken in Heisel's article and this commentary is whether "empathy" can be the road into a character, and whether this process is any different in the performance of an opera or art song than in acting in a theatrical work. First, however, empathy must be clearly defined and differentiated from other emotional and cognitive processes in performance.
DEFINING EMPATHYEmpathy has long been a complicated term to define in psychology-not least because of its use in lay language as well as scientific writings. In lay language, empathy is used in contexts from cognitively understanding what someone else is feeling and experiencing, to having compassion for another's pain. In between are a variety of definitions, including experiencing the emotions of another person, and regulating ones' own emotions to have an appropriate emotional reaction to another. This has caused some theorists and researchers to call for abandoning empathy as a term in the scientific language. Rather, empathy should be broken into its underlying components, and scholars should study and discuss those components instead. Those components could include: understanding others' mental and emotional states; concurrently feeling the emotions of another person; "catching" the emotions of another person through emotion contagion; and feeling sympathy or compassion for another's states (Batson, 2009;Coplan, 2011;Decety & Cowell, 2014).In trying to define what she means by the term empathy, Heisel (2015) comments directly on the notion of ridding our language of the term empathy, citing Gunkle's (1971) argument on empathy in theatrical audiences' reactions. Gunkle argued that empathy consists of such a large number of processes that using it as a catch-all term is essentially meaningless. Heisel comments that instead of not using the term, it should be placed in the aesthetic realm. Yet Gunkle's argument is not for the abandonment of empathy per se, but instead for clarification of its use and deeper thought about the psychological processes that underlie understanding a character's thoughts and feelings.The idea behind the Gunkle quote is a correct one-we should determine exactly which definition of empathy Heisel is using in her exploration of empathy as a humanizing process for singers of opera an...