2015
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt18fs65g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power and Its Disguises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Антрополошко проучавање државе може се пратити од књиге Афрички политички системи, коју су уредили Мејер Фортес и Еванс-Причард, а за коју је предговор написао Редклиф-Браун (уп. Gledhill 2000;Krohn-Hansen and Nustad 2005). У том, сада чувеном предговору, Редклиф-Браун експлицитно одбацује државу као предмет антрополошке анализе, наводећи да је држава искључиво идеолошки конструкт.…”
Section: антрополошко проучавање државе: филип абрамс среће анархи брunclassified
“…Антрополошко проучавање државе може се пратити од књиге Афрички политички системи, коју су уредили Мејер Фортес и Еванс-Причард, а за коју је предговор написао Редклиф-Браун (уп. Gledhill 2000;Krohn-Hansen and Nustad 2005). У том, сада чувеном предговору, Редклиф-Браун експлицитно одбацује државу као предмет антрополошке анализе, наводећи да је држава искључиво идеолошки конструкт.…”
Section: антрополошко проучавање државе: филип абрамс среће анархи брunclassified
“…My proposal is that by looking closely at a particular ritual dialogic which occurs routinely in certain egalitarian societies, we can begin to grasp a new kind of politics: visceral, kinetic, erotic, live; an expansive power churned up from the motion of bodies acting together and upon one another. Assuming that the political is ‘invariably centred on coercive power’ (Gledhill : 13) has obscured our appreciation of systems such as these, in which power never settles in the hands of any one group or individual but is continually funnelled back and forth between coalitions.…”
Section: Power As the Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Returning to the issue of how to understand egalitarian systems, Woodburn, like Gledhill (), has made the point that equality in such societies is never neutral – ‘the mere absence of inequality or hierarchy’ (Woodburn : 431) – but is assertively and repeatedly acted out. Egalitarian society is defined by a number of features which set it apart from hierarchical society, and an acknowledgement of these is central to understanding women's status in such groups.…”
Section: Power As the Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a line of argument, trust can therefore be viewed as an end in itself as well as a lubricant for social and economic action as noted in Ref. [16]. This view highlights the dimension of trust as a goal in itself as well as 'oil' for socio-economic action.…”
Section: Trust As Social Capital Among Malayishasmentioning
confidence: 99%