2014
DOI: 10.1021/es501657w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Exposure of Pollinators to Neonicotinoid Insecticides from the Use of Insecticide Seed Treatments in the Mid-Southern United States

Abstract: Research was done during 2012 to evaluate the potential exposure of pollinators to neonicotinoid insecticides used as seed treatments on corn, cotton, and soybean. Samples were collected from small plot evaluations of seed treatments and from commercial fields in agricultural production areas in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Tennessee. In total, 560 samples were analyzed for concentrations of clothianidin, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and their metabolites. These included pollen from corn and cotton, nectar from c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
98
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
98
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Low concentrations of imidacloprid were reported on soybean flowers of both Jackson and Yum-Yum locations, while no neonicotinoids were found in corn and sorghum flowers (Table IV). The neonicotinoid residues in our study are much higher than what has been reported in a recent study conducted in western Tennessee (Stewart et al 2014), but this study was targeting seed treatment effects whereas our current study would be influenced by foliar-applied insecticides. The recovered foragers seemed not to have encountered the pesticides detected in the crops' flowers, as no high concentrations were detected in those bees (Table IV).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Low concentrations of imidacloprid were reported on soybean flowers of both Jackson and Yum-Yum locations, while no neonicotinoids were found in corn and sorghum flowers (Table IV). The neonicotinoid residues in our study are much higher than what has been reported in a recent study conducted in western Tennessee (Stewart et al 2014), but this study was targeting seed treatment effects whereas our current study would be influenced by foliar-applied insecticides. The recovered foragers seemed not to have encountered the pesticides detected in the crops' flowers, as no high concentrations were detected in those bees (Table IV).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Regarding the treatments selected here, even in agriculturally intensive areas, such as the southeastern U.S., concentrations as high as 100 ppb have seldom been reported in pollen or nectar. Stewart et al [35] found that neonicotinoid levels in soils and wild flowers after seed treatment applications in experimental and commercial plots seldom exceeded 50 ppb. Bees exposed to high levels of imidacloprid in nectar also may simply reduce or avoid feeding on contaminated nectar, whether or not alternative forage is available [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Widespread NI crop treatment has increased overall pesticide use across North America 2 , despite growing evidence of toxic effects on wild and domestic bee populations 3, 4 , aquatic invertebrates 57 , and insectivorous birds 8 . NIs contaminate wetlands, via runoff and snowmelt from treated fields 9 , and wildflower and soil samples near treated fields at concentrations exceeding 10 ng/g 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%