2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential and economic feasibility of solar home systems implementation in Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
39
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A survey was conducted on the Copyright ⓒ 2017 SERSC economic and financial feasibility analysis on SHS installation for lighting facility by replacing kerosene based lighting. Due to the replacement of kerosene by SHS, the survey results found shorter payback period ranging around 1.13 to 2.37 years for different SHS installation capacity of around 20Wp to 42Wp [32]. According to the survey data it was also revealed that by replacing expensive usages of kerosene, the total predicted high costs incurred by the kerosene for using 20 years exceeds the initial installation costs of a SHS unit in a rural household, considering the replacement lifetime for solar panels are 20 years.…”
Section: Figure 19 Cumulative Power Generation From Shss [2]mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A survey was conducted on the Copyright ⓒ 2017 SERSC economic and financial feasibility analysis on SHS installation for lighting facility by replacing kerosene based lighting. Due to the replacement of kerosene by SHS, the survey results found shorter payback period ranging around 1.13 to 2.37 years for different SHS installation capacity of around 20Wp to 42Wp [32]. According to the survey data it was also revealed that by replacing expensive usages of kerosene, the total predicted high costs incurred by the kerosene for using 20 years exceeds the initial installation costs of a SHS unit in a rural household, considering the replacement lifetime for solar panels are 20 years.…”
Section: Figure 19 Cumulative Power Generation From Shss [2]mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, the SHS does not contribute to any indoor pollution hence allowing SHS users to stay healthy. Rural electrification through SHS also plays noticeable role in climate protection which is also evident from the fact that significant amount of fossil fuel usages especially kerosene is reduced by every SHShousehold rather non-SHS adopters resulting bringing down the overall usages of kerosene to more than 92 million liters in every year because of SHS installations throughout the rural Bangladesh [32,33]. Thus, rural electrification using SHS do not develop any soot or any noxious odors unlike kerosene, ensuring 100 times better quality lighting without providing any adverse effects to the environment [32].…”
Section: Environmental Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some studies found marginal benefits: in Sri Lanka, socio-economic impacts were mainly related to longer study hours for children and longer TV watching hours (Wijayatunga & Attalage, 2005), while Mala et al's (2009) study on SHS in Kiribati found only marginal improvements in business productivity over time. Studies centred on Bangladesh (Halder, 2016;Samad et al, 2013) have shown increases in children's study time and health benefits resulting from SHS. In India, Barman et al (2017) found that SHS produced noticeable increases in mobile phone charging and children's study hours, although it was found that social awareness of potential livelihood improvements was crucial for the system's viability.…”
Section: Solar Home Systems (Shs)mentioning
confidence: 99%