2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf02869607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potato sprout inhibition and tuber quality after treatment with high-energy ionizing radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4a, the glucose content of M 2 was higher than the control (P \ 0.05), while glucose content of M 1 was lower, and there was no significant difference between them. The change in glucose was similar earlier report (Frazier et al 2006). Compared to M 0 , fructose content of M 2 was declined significantly (P \ 0.05), and M 1 was lower than M 0 (P \ 0.05) (Fig.…”
Section: Sucrose Fructose and Glucose Contentsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…4a, the glucose content of M 2 was higher than the control (P \ 0.05), while glucose content of M 1 was lower, and there was no significant difference between them. The change in glucose was similar earlier report (Frazier et al 2006). Compared to M 0 , fructose content of M 2 was declined significantly (P \ 0.05), and M 1 was lower than M 0 (P \ 0.05) (Fig.…”
Section: Sucrose Fructose and Glucose Contentsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The critical problem, however, is to find the optimum radiation level that can fulfill the preservation requirements without causing serious chemical alteration of the food, which would affect its organic acceptability and wholesomeness, Farkas (1985). As Frazier et al (2006) showed successful sprout suppression was achieved with doses of 40-50 Gy while higher doses caused undesirable increase in reducing sugars in the tubers. On the other hand Umeda et al (1969) showed that higher storage temperature required higher dose of radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The recommended gamma irradiation dose for sprout suppression varies from 40 ... 50 Gy to 120 ... 150 Gy [43][44][45][46][47]. The dose sufficient for sprout inhibition is apparently cultivar specific.…”
Section: Inhibiting Effect Of High Gamma Irradiation Dosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since bud tissues in eyes are meristematic and are least tolerant to gamma irradiation, their blackening occurs at 500 Gy [46]. Tuber lots with high rot potential may not be suitable for gamma irradiation treatment at all [43].…”
Section: Inhibiting Effect Of High Gamma Irradiation Dosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation