2014
DOI: 10.14415/konferencijagfs2014.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postupanje Sa Izuzetnim Vrednostima U Statističkoj Analizi Velikih Voda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GEV has been confirmed as the best distribution function in a large number of European basins [48,49] and beyond [50,51]. As a positive feature, the consistent estimation of the confidence interval is found [52], as well as minor sensitivity of the right distribution tail to low outliers, which is of considerable practical importance in flood analysis [53].…”
Section: At-site Flood Quantile Estimationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…GEV has been confirmed as the best distribution function in a large number of European basins [48,49] and beyond [50,51]. As a positive feature, the consistent estimation of the confidence interval is found [52], as well as minor sensitivity of the right distribution tail to low outliers, which is of considerable practical importance in flood analysis [53].…”
Section: At-site Flood Quantile Estimationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A new Multiple Grubbs-Beck outlier statistical test in B17C is a replacement for the simple Grubbs-Beck test of B17B, and as such, it is incorporated in the HEC-SSP. It is used in the outlier detection procedure, and in the outlier treatment, censoring for low outliers is applied [7]. Also, a multiple-threshold plotting positions according to Hirsch and Stedinger [8] is a default option in the HEC-SSP Bulletin 17C analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blagojević et al [23] used the GB test on 68 streamflow gauging stations in Serbia to investigate the presence of high and low flow outliers in the AM flood series and concluded that outlier detection is important in design flood estimation. Lamontagne et al [24] proposed a MGB test to identify PILFs in AM flood data from California and they found that censoring and identifying PILFs improved FFA results to be more robust and precise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%