2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative infection risk after splenectomy: A prospective cohort study

Abstract: Splenectomy increases the risk for post-operative infectious complications. Further studies identifying strategies to decrease the associated morbidity are necessary.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of splenectomy on distant organ injury appears to be organ dependent. While splenectomy is an independent risk factor of postoperative complications including early postsurgical infections and lung injury, it appears to have a protective effect on ischaemic damage to the brain and liver [36][37][38][39]. In support of our findings, splenectomy has been shown to have a significant beneficial effect in an animal model of kidney ischaemia-reperfusion injury [40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The impact of splenectomy on distant organ injury appears to be organ dependent. While splenectomy is an independent risk factor of postoperative complications including early postsurgical infections and lung injury, it appears to have a protective effect on ischaemic damage to the brain and liver [36][37][38][39]. In support of our findings, splenectomy has been shown to have a significant beneficial effect in an animal model of kidney ischaemia-reperfusion injury [40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In a comparative study patients with splenectomy vs. patients with other abdominal surgery had 49 % vs. 29 % of POM respectively (OR 2.7 [95 % CI 1.3, 5.6]); but on a subgroup analysis, there were no differences between traumatic and elective splenectomy with regards to overall infectious complications (50 % vs. 46 %, p = 0.84) (Evidence level type 4) (Barmparas et al, 2015). Surgical wound infection is up to 7.0 %.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-nine articles in extensive were discarded for failing to meet the eligibility criteria. Finally, the population in study consisted of 35 articles, 3 of evidence level type 3a (Renzulli et al, 2009;He et al, 2014;Piccolo et al, 2014), 32 of evidence level type 4 (Bagrodia et al, 2014;Barmparas et al, 2015;Bracale et al, 2013;Cassar & Munro, 2009;Coon, 1990;Chung et al, 2011;Davies et al, 2014;Eaton et al, 2000;Eber et al, 1999;Edgren et al, 2014;Flum et al, 2001;Geraci et al, 2014;Gómez Alonso et al, 2001;Ha & Minchin, 2009;Harbrecht et al, 2008;Holubar et al, 2009;Kamath et al, 2009;Malek et al, 2007;Masoomi et al, 2012;McIntyre et al, 2005;Merchea et al, 2012;Nikolaev et al, 1990;Ong et al, 1991;Paredes et al, 2013;Rogers et al, 1980;Singla, et al, 2012;Tan et al, 2011;Urschel, 1993;Wang et al, 2011;Yong et al, 2010; and 1 of evidence level type 5 (American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-abdominal abscesses can also occur due to injury to the stomach, pancreas or intestine during splenectomy, but the incidence reported is less than 1 percent and the presentation is usually early during the post-operative period[8,9]. Splenectomy performed for splenic abscess can present with intra-abdominal abscess due to contamination of peritoneal cavity and post-splenectomy immunosuppressed state[10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%