1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1996.tb00049.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postmarketing surveillance of oral terbinafine in the UK: report of a large cohort study

Abstract: 1. A 1 in 200 sample of the Southampton electorate were sent a postal questionnaire in January 1993. Of the 756 adults surveyed, 400 (52.9%) returned completed questionnaires. One hundred and eighty-eight (47.0%) of the respondents had been prescribed a medicine within the previous month. 2. Compared with a survey 9 years earlier, medicine taking had increased amongst men (44.1% vs 33.7% NS) and drugs acting on the respiratory system were in more widespread use (19 vs 7 patients P < 0.05). 3. Patterns of stora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The result shows that the high number of SAE-cases in the second half of the observed period could be explained by an increase in consumption of terbinafine. Safety reports from clinical trials, as well as surveillance studies, have proven good safety records for terbinafine (5)(6)(7). In our study, hepatobiliary disorders and the category "Investigations", which mostly covered an increase in liver enzymes, were among the three most prevalent SAEs reported, indicating a potential risk of hepatic dysfunction in the use of terbinafine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The result shows that the high number of SAE-cases in the second half of the observed period could be explained by an increase in consumption of terbinafine. Safety reports from clinical trials, as well as surveillance studies, have proven good safety records for terbinafine (5)(6)(7). In our study, hepatobiliary disorders and the category "Investigations", which mostly covered an increase in liver enzymes, were among the three most prevalent SAEs reported, indicating a potential risk of hepatic dysfunction in the use of terbinafine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the population of 25 884 patients, only 10.5% experienced an adverse event of any type or cause. Slightly more than half of all adverse events were consid¬ ered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to terbinafine, and these conform to the known safety pro¬ file of the drug.…”
Section: Drug-drug Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Side‐effects include; gastrointestinal disturbances and rashes in 5% and 3% of cases, respectively. 21 ( Strength of recommendation = A/B; quality of evidence = I/IIi . )…”
Section: Therapy Of Tinea Capitismentioning
confidence: 99%