2014
DOI: 10.4081/ni.2014.5376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: differences between pregnant and non-pregnant patients

Abstract: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a clinical-radiologic entity not yet understood, that presents with transient neurologic symptoms and particular radiological findings. Few papers show the differences between pregnant and non-pregnant patients. We review the cases of 38 women diagnosed with PRES, in order to find significant differences between pregnant (18) and non-pregnant (20) patients. We found differences among the age of patients (25.83 years old in pregnant and 29.31 years old in n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of these MRI characteristics in our case meant that the neurologists quickly excluded PRES as a diagnosis. Additionally, although Marrone et al described a lower average systolic blood pressure trigger in pregnant patients with PRES (162 mm Hg), as compared with non-pregnant patients with PRES (185 mm Hg),4 our patient’s systolic blood pressure did not exceed 129 at any point, again making PRES an extremely unlikely diagnosis in the presence of MRI findings which were more in keeping with an acute stroke (figure 1).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The absence of these MRI characteristics in our case meant that the neurologists quickly excluded PRES as a diagnosis. Additionally, although Marrone et al described a lower average systolic blood pressure trigger in pregnant patients with PRES (162 mm Hg), as compared with non-pregnant patients with PRES (185 mm Hg),4 our patient’s systolic blood pressure did not exceed 129 at any point, again making PRES an extremely unlikely diagnosis in the presence of MRI findings which were more in keeping with an acute stroke (figure 1).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…41 PRES is manifested by transient neurologic symptoms, such as headache, mental status changes, visual impairment, or seizures with neuroradiologic findings of vasogenic edema in the posterior circulation of the brain. 40,42 When encountered in the setting of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, treatment typically focuses on attenuating hypertension in an attempt to avert irreversible ischemic injury of the brain. 41…”
Section: Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 There are two prevailing hypotheses: cytotoxic and vasogenic. 4 5 Eclampsia, renal failure, autoimmune diseases, and chemotherapy treatment and other factors may trigger PRES. 1 5 Despite its classically favorable outcome, PRES is associated with direct mortality in 5-15% of cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%