Aortic insufficiency (AI) during continuous flow (CF) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) treatment is one of the major complications that reduces patient exercise tolerability and increases the cardiovascular event rate. 1) We reported that preserved pulse pressure (PP) was associated with prevention of AI by repressing remodeling of the aortic root and degeneration of native aortic valve (AV).1) However, the relationship between AI and EVAHEART, which tends to preserve PP better than other devices, 2) remains uncertain. We here compared EVAHEART with other devices from the viewpoint of AI.We enrolled 45 patients who had undergone CF LVAD (EVAHEART, 14; DuraHeart, 9; HeartMate II, 14; Jarvik 2000, 7; HeartWare, 1) between 2006 and 2015. We excluded patients whose native aortic valve (AV) was open because no AI developed in such patients as we described previously.1) We defined < 30% of native AV opening per native heart rate as "remaining closed", and patients whose AV remained closed at 6 months after the operation were enrolled. The rotation speed was optimized considering patient hemodynamics and interventricular septum shift observed in regular echocardiography. Preoperative baseline characteristics were obtained < 24 hours before LVAD implantation. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed regularly, and we defined AI as aortic regurgitation ≥ mild at 6 months.There were no significant differences in preoperative background characteristics between the EVAHEART group and other devices group (Table I). Of 45 patients with a closed native AV, 14 (31%) avoided development of AI. Among preoperative data, EVAHEART usage was the only significant predictor of AI-free (P = 0.012, odds ratio 15.79). After the operation, most of the patients (93%) avoided AI during EVA-HEART treatment. PP was higher in the EVAHEART group, and the aortic root was less dilated in the EVAHEART group compared with the other devices group (Table II, P < 0.05 for all comparison).Some patients achieve improvement of LV ejection fraction through LV reverse remodeling under unloading by LVAD and opening of the native AV, and avoid AI. 3,4) Although the opening of the native AV is the first target to avoid AI, most patients have a closed native AV accompanied by a persistent low LV ejection fraction.1) Among such patients, the preservation of pulsatility is important. Preserved PP prevents remodeling of the aortic root and degeneration of the native AV, and then avoids AI.
1)We previously showed that pulsatile flow LVAD had an advantage over CF LVAD for preventing AI by preserving PP.
5)However, pulsatile flow devices are not recommended under most of the current situation, considering the established advantages of CF LVADs over pulsatile flow devices. 6) Among CF LVADs, we also showed that centrifugal devices had an advantage over axial ones for preventing AI, because centrifugal pumps tend to preserve PP.
1)One of the centrifugal pumps, EVAHEART, provides extraordinary augmentation capability of pulsatility by providing wide-ranging flo...