2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible causes and significance of cranial robusticity among Pleistocene–Early Holocene Australians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(179 reference statements)
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cranial vault thickness (CVT) has been measured and reported repeatedly by anthropologists studying modern human populations, especially when it is unusually thick or thin (Baab, Freidline, Wang, & Hanson, ; Bernal, Perez, & Gonzalez, ; Brown, ; Brown, ; Curnoe, ; Hrdlicka, ; Lahr & Wright, ). However, it is the extremely thick cranial vaults noted as a diagnostic characteristic of Homo erectus since the first fossil of the species was identified (Andrews, ; Antón, ; Antón, ; Bilsborough & Wood, ; Dubois, ; Weidenreich, ) that capture the interest of many researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cranial vault thickness (CVT) has been measured and reported repeatedly by anthropologists studying modern human populations, especially when it is unusually thick or thin (Baab, Freidline, Wang, & Hanson, ; Bernal, Perez, & Gonzalez, ; Brown, ; Brown, ; Curnoe, ; Hrdlicka, ; Lahr & Wright, ). However, it is the extremely thick cranial vaults noted as a diagnostic characteristic of Homo erectus since the first fossil of the species was identified (Andrews, ; Antón, ; Antón, ; Bilsborough & Wood, ; Dubois, ; Weidenreich, ) that capture the interest of many researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cranial vault thickness (CVT) is computed as the distance between the endocranial and ectocranial surfaces. Several studies have pointed out that CVT differs not only among hominids (e.g., Kennedy, 1991;Nawrocki, 1991;Gauld, 1996;Balzeau, 2013) but also among modern human populations (Curnoe, 2009;Marsh, 2013). Bone thickness is assumed not to be strongly genetically determined, but is mainly influenced by systemic and local stimuli (e.g., Lieberman, 1996;Baab et al, 2010;Menegaz et al, 2010;Anzelmo et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putting aside epigenetic explanations involving pseudopathology [17, 146150], this trait fails to satisfy all three assumptions of phylogenetic reconstruction. The size and shape of the growing brain in accordance with the functional matrix hypothesis [77, 88, 114, 115] and its epigenetic interactions with the developing cranial base largely determine the size and shape of the vault.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%