Portuguese version of the <i>Delirium Rating Scale‐Revised‐98</i>: reliability and validity

Negreiros, Daniel; Meleiro, Alexandrina Maria Augusto da Silva; Furlanetto, Letícia Maria; Trzepacz, Paula T.

doi:10.1002/gps.1906

Cited by 21 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It has been subsequently translated and revalidated in countries outside of the U.S. Translations were used, as appropriate, and raters had been trained as part of individual projects. The DRS-R98 versions used had very high inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.9), and excellent validity as shown by the area under the curve >0.9 (Receiver-Operator Characteristic analyses) when comparing DSM Delirium vs. Non-delirium patients for all DRS-R98 versions utilized in this study [13,14,16,17,19,21,22]. The DRS-R98 broadly measures delirium phenomenology using anchored item descriptors and has been validated against other neuropsychiatric disorders making it an ideal instrument to assess phenomenology.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…De-identified cross-sectional data for adult patients from 14 studies (11 of them published) conducted by expert delirium researchers in 7 countries (United States, Brazil, Colombia, Ireland, Taiwan, Korea and Japan) from 4 continents comprised the pooled database (see Supplemental Table 1S) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Investigators were invited by Dr. Trzepacz, the developer of the DRS-R98, to participate in this study because they had previously received permission to use the scale for work related to its validation.…”

Section: Dataset Selection and Inclusion Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Phenotype of subsyndromal delirium using pooled multicultural Delirium Rating Scale—Revised-98 data

Trzepacz

Vásquez

Meagher

et al. 2012

Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Dataset Selection and Inclusion Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Phenotype of subsyndromal delirium using pooled multicultural Delirium Rating Scale—Revised-98 data

Trzepacz

Vásquez

Meagher

et al. 2012

Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Specificity and sensitivity values are also comparable with other translations of DRS-R-98. Cut-off scores have varied a little across various translations when revalidated in different countries (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), though they represent a tight range of scores taken together, and may be reflect the specific cohort evaluated in those studies. We acknowledge that selecting a cut-off score of 11 for the DRS-R-98 severity score improves sensitivity but realize that using 13 as a cut-off score may provide better balance between sensitivity and specificity and where the LR is the highest.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The DRS-R-98 is available in a number of languages including Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Greek, Danish, Dutch, German, French, Lithuanian, Norwegian, Italian, Turkish, Hebrew, and both traditional and modern Chinese (4,10,11). The DRS-R-98 has been revalidated in several countries (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and validity of the Turkish translation of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98

Çinar¹,

Özmenler²,

Özşahin³

et al. 2014

Dusunen Adam

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reliability and validity of the Turkish translation of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98Objective: Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric disorder. The Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98) is a widely used and well-validated delirium diagnostic and severity scale that has been translated into many languages. We investigated the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the DRS-R-98.Method: Data for 30 consecutive delirium patients were obtained from consultation-liaison psychiatry referrals and 30 non-delirium patients were from routine screening following cardiovascular surgery. Two psychiatrist researchers diagnosed all cases using DSM-IV criteria, and independently administered the DRS-R-98 and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Concurrent validity, interrater reliability, inter-battery factor analysis, internal consistency, sensitivity and specificity at various scale cut-off values were analyzed as well as descriptive analyses were performed.Results: Mean age was 70.2±15.4 and 62.8±12.6, and mean DRS-R-98 total score was 25.7±6.3 and 4.5±2.5 for delirium and non-delirium groups, respectively. Cronbachs' α intraclass coefficients measuring interrater reliability for DRS-R-98 severity and total scale scores were both 0.99 (SVD: 203.74; SVD: 282.98, respectively).DRS-R-98 severity scores were correlated with MMSE (r=-0.87, p<0.001 for both raters). Internal consistency was high for the DRS-R-98 (Cronbachs' α=0.964). Cut-off score of 16 for the DRS-R-98 total score had 100% sensitivity and 88.5% specificity, whereas 11 for the DRS-R-98 severity scale had 100% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity. Conclusion:We believe the DRS-R-98 Turkish version is a valid and reliable tool for clinicians and researchers. toplam için 16 kesme puanının duyarlılığı %100, özgüllüğü %88.5 iken, DRS-R-98 şiddet için 11 kesme puanının duyarlılığı %100, özgüllüğü %85.7 olarak bulunmuştur.Sonuç: DRS-R-98 Türkçe çevirisinin klinisyenler ve araştırmacılar için geçerli ve güvenilir olduğuna, yapılacak deliryum çalışmalarına katkıda bulunacağına inanmaktayız.

show abstract

“…En todos los estudios en los que se ha evaluado la sensibilidad al cambio (diferencia de medias de puntuación), la p del estadístico t ha sido <0.05 [64][65][66][67][68][69] . El punto de corte ≥12 tiene sensibilidad de 82.4% y especificidad de 95.7% para el diagnóstico de delirium (versión colombiana) 64 .…”

Section: Características Clínicas (Evolutivas Y Etiológicas)unclassified

Instrumentos para el diagnóstico de delirium en hispanohablantes: artículo de revisión

Gaviria¹

2016

MedUPB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMENEl delirium es un síndrome potencialmente tratable, de presentación aguda con secuelas crónicas sobre la morbimortalidad de quienes lo sufren. Frecuentemente, se pasa por alto y, para subsanar esta situación, en principio es indispensable que todo el personal de salud sea consciente de la importancia del trastorno en su trabajo diario y, en segundo lugar, es necesario conocer las herramientas útiles para su evaluación, tanto por parte de los especialistas en neurociencias como por el personal tratante de las diversas áreas de la medicina. En este artículo se presenta información práctica sobre las características de los instrumentos para evaluar el delirium en diversos escenarios, con énfasis en los disponibles en español. Se describen algunos aspectos de validez y confiabilidad relevantes y se presenta una tabla con el resumen cualitativo de los datos más significativos para las diversas escalas descritas. El uso habitual de estas herramientas redundaría en una mejor atención de los pacientes y será el punto de partida para generar información que permita mejorar la calidad de los instrumentos o plantear la necesidad de validar o crear otros en países iberoamericanos. Palabras clave: delirio; demencia; diagnóstico; escalas de valoración psiquiátrica; evaluación geriátrica; estudios de validación. ABSTRACTDelirium is a potentially treatable syndrome of acute onset with chronic sequelae, which can be measured in terms of morbidity and mortality. Because it is frequently disregarded, health personnel must be conscious of its importance as they go about their daily work, and it is necessary for neuroscience specialists and other health professionals to be familiar with the assessment instruments available. This article offers practical information regarding the characteristics of the assessment instruments for delirium in different settings focusing on those available in Spanish. We describe some aspects concerning validity and reliability and present a summary table of the most important qualitative data for the instruments described. The routine application of these methods would result in better patient service and would make information acquisition possible to improve the quality of instruments available or even show the need for validating and creating new ones in Ibero-American countries.

show abstract

Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale‐Revised‐98: reliability and validity

Abstract: The Portuguese version of the DRS-R-98 is a valid and reliable measure of delirium that distinguishes delirium from other disorders and is sensitive to change in delirium severity, which may be of great value for longitudinal studies.

Cited by 21 publications

References 13 publications

Phenotype of subsyndromal delirium using pooled multicultural Delirium Rating Scale—Revised-98 data

Phenotype of subsyndromal delirium using pooled multicultural Delirium Rating Scale—Revised-98 data

Reliability and validity of the Turkish translation of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98

Instrumentos para el diagnóstico de delirium en hispanohablantes: artículo de revisión

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About