2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01981-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population variability in space and time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
109
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
109
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(Sielezniew et al 2012) Parameters presented include sample size within locality (N); number of alleles (A), allelic richness (R), observed and expected heterozygosity heterozygosity (H O and H E respectively), P value for HWE exact test for heterozygote deficiency/excess (ns indicates non-significant values exceeding 0.05), and fixation index (F IS ; Bonferroni corrected P value at α = 0.05, based on 900 randomisations, was 0.0011) Long-term trend in population size is the most evident predictor of extinction risk (Caughley 1994;Keith et al 2015). In the absence of a clear trend, the extent of population size fluctuations, serving as an inverse measure of stability, makes a useful indicator of population viability, as more fluctuating populations are more vulnerable to extinctions (Caughley 1994;Lundberg et al 2000;Nowicki 2017). However, the assessment of both trend as well as fluctuation level requires relatively long time series of quantitative data for a particular population, which are rarely available, especially in the case of insects (Schtickzelle and Baguette 2009;Nowicki 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Sielezniew et al 2012) Parameters presented include sample size within locality (N); number of alleles (A), allelic richness (R), observed and expected heterozygosity heterozygosity (H O and H E respectively), P value for HWE exact test for heterozygote deficiency/excess (ns indicates non-significant values exceeding 0.05), and fixation index (F IS ; Bonferroni corrected P value at α = 0.05, based on 900 randomisations, was 0.0011) Long-term trend in population size is the most evident predictor of extinction risk (Caughley 1994;Keith et al 2015). In the absence of a clear trend, the extent of population size fluctuations, serving as an inverse measure of stability, makes a useful indicator of population viability, as more fluctuating populations are more vulnerable to extinctions (Caughley 1994;Lundberg et al 2000;Nowicki 2017). However, the assessment of both trend as well as fluctuation level requires relatively long time series of quantitative data for a particular population, which are rarely available, especially in the case of insects (Schtickzelle and Baguette 2009;Nowicki 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, the population fluctuations in different habitats appear to be, to a certain extent, correlated; the phenomenon known as synchronization [85,87]. The example of aphids considered above is therefore by no means unique.…”
Section: Landscape Scale: Synchronization and Self-organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal and spatial fluctuations in number of individuals are marked characteristics of all animal populations (Heino et al, 1997;Lundberg et al, 2000). Inspired by the seminal work of Elton & Nicholson (1942) and Moran (1953), the temporal dynamics in number of individuals from spatially distributed subpopulations are currently one of the main themes investigated by ecologists (Kendal et al, 2000;Ylikarjula et al, 2000;Grenouillet et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%