2023
DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic modeling of clopidogrel for dose regimen optimization based on CYP2C19 phenotypes: A proof of concept study

Yun Seob Jung,
Byung Hak Jin,
Min Soo Park
et al.

Abstract: Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet drug used to reduce the risk of acute coronary syndrome and stroke. It is converted by CYP2C19 to its active metabolite; therefore, poor metabolizers (PMs) of CYP2C19 exhibit diminished antiplatelet effects. Herein, we conducted a proof‐of‐concept study for using population pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic (PK‐PD) modeling to recommend a personalized clopidogrel dosing regimen for individuals with varying CYP2C19 phenotypes and baseline P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) levels. Data from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was presumed that all parent drugs would ultimately undergo metabolism in this compartment. Integrated semi-physiological models of similar structure with FPEs have been previously published [4,24,36,37]. The model employed a physiological liver volume of 1.5 L and a liver plasma flow (Q h ) of 50 L/h [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It was presumed that all parent drugs would ultimately undergo metabolism in this compartment. Integrated semi-physiological models of similar structure with FPEs have been previously published [4,24,36,37]. The model employed a physiological liver volume of 1.5 L and a liver plasma flow (Q h ) of 50 L/h [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain parameters needed to be fixed to ensure the stability of the model. Hence, F aM was fixed to the estimated value of 12%, which corresponded to the literature data [1][2][3][4]. Nevertheless, a sensitivity analysis was performed by varying the values of F aM at 10% and 15%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations