2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population genomic data delineate conservation units in mottled ducks (Anas fulvigula)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
3
39
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…admixture results suggest that several individuals among the monochromatic taxa show some evidence of mixed ancestry, but only one mottled duck from Florida showed evidence of elevated coancestry with mallards in the fineRADstructure analysis (Figures and ). Given the greater sensitivity of fineRADstructure to recent ancestry (Malinsky, Trucchi, et al, ), we conclude that putative signals of admixture in the admixture analysis are likely due to shared ancestral variation (i.e., ILS), and that the occurrence of hybrid individuals in our data set is low, consistent with other recent analyses of the NW “mallards” (Ford, Selman, & Taylor, ; Lavretsky et al, ; Peters et al, ). We note, however, that we intentionally avoided sampling in geographic regions where mallards and Mexican ducks come into contact, and Peters et al () only examined mottled ducks that were phenotypically “pure,” though this sampling protocol would not necessarily exclude subsequent generation backcrosses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…admixture results suggest that several individuals among the monochromatic taxa show some evidence of mixed ancestry, but only one mottled duck from Florida showed evidence of elevated coancestry with mallards in the fineRADstructure analysis (Figures and ). Given the greater sensitivity of fineRADstructure to recent ancestry (Malinsky, Trucchi, et al, ), we conclude that putative signals of admixture in the admixture analysis are likely due to shared ancestral variation (i.e., ILS), and that the occurrence of hybrid individuals in our data set is low, consistent with other recent analyses of the NW “mallards” (Ford, Selman, & Taylor, ; Lavretsky et al, ; Peters et al, ). We note, however, that we intentionally avoided sampling in geographic regions where mallards and Mexican ducks come into contact, and Peters et al () only examined mottled ducks that were phenotypically “pure,” though this sampling protocol would not necessarily exclude subsequent generation backcrosses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this study, the thousands of loci recovered using ddRAD‐seq did not include any perfectly diagnostic SNPs, but did include a sufficient number of loci with differences in allele frequencies to allow multi‐locus assignment of individuals to populations. Importantly, complementing recent studies showing multi‐locus genetic discrimination of mallards and Mexican ducks (Lavretsky et al, ) and the two mottled duck subspecies (Peters et al, ), respectively, we demonstrate that mallards and black ducks are also distinguishable using ddRAD‐seq data (Figures and ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, torrent ducks from Peru had values of mtDNA diversity more similar to those found in other ducks with Ne several orders of magnitude larger Ne (e.g., mallards; Lavretsky et al, 2015). In contrast to mtDNA, diversity estimates from nuclear DNA for the two torrent duck subspecies were lower compared to other waterfowl species (Lavretsky et al, 2015;Lavretsky et al, 2016;Peters et al, 2016;Wilson et al, 2012). In contrast to mtDNA, diversity estimates from nuclear DNA for the two torrent duck subspecies were lower compared to other waterfowl species (Lavretsky et al, 2015;Lavretsky et al, 2016;Peters et al, 2016;Wilson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Genetic Diversity and Small Effective Population Sizementioning
confidence: 73%