1969
DOI: 10.1115/1.3580179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pool Boiling Heat Transfer From Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel

Abstract: Stainless steel specimens have been coated with Teflon to produce nonwetted surfaces. The data indicate improved pool boiling heat transfer with a 0.0003-in. coating as compared to an uncoated specimen. However, thicker coatings were found to insulate the surface and impede the rate of heat transfer. Nonwetting is explained as the mechanism for enhanced heat transfer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous low-surface-energy materials coating have been tested to increase the liquid-surface contact angle on the inner wall of cavities and therefore increase the number of active nucleating sites . The typical materials are the polymer-based coatings, such as the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) with thin-film or patterned morphology, which make the wettability transition from hydrophilic to the hydrophobic/superhydrophilic surface. However, because of the thermal cycling of the heating surface, the coating layer stripping from the surface cannot be sustained for a long time. The thicker coating layer has shown the potential to maintain robust hydrophobicity, but it typically has a large thermal resistance that reduces the heat transfer enhancement gained by increasing nucleation sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous low-surface-energy materials coating have been tested to increase the liquid-surface contact angle on the inner wall of cavities and therefore increase the number of active nucleating sites . The typical materials are the polymer-based coatings, such as the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) with thin-film or patterned morphology, which make the wettability transition from hydrophilic to the hydrophobic/superhydrophilic surface. However, because of the thermal cycling of the heating surface, the coating layer stripping from the surface cannot be sustained for a long time. The thicker coating layer has shown the potential to maintain robust hydrophobicity, but it typically has a large thermal resistance that reduces the heat transfer enhancement gained by increasing nucleation sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative, since the contact angle of a liquid on a heated surface affects bubble nucleation, nonwetting surface coatings such as paraffin and Teflon have been investigated [9][10][11]. Since nonwetting coatings provide nucleation sites at a lowered surface superheat compared to wetting surfaces, nucleate boiling heat transfer is improved at low heat fluxes;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to design and fabricate copper-based high-efficiency boiling heat transfer (BHT) interfaces has attracted intensive interest in the past decades due to their values in fundamental research and technological innovations, e.g ., improving the efficiency of energy utilization and heat dissipation of thermal devices. BHT is an endothermic process characterized by liquid–vapor phase transition. BHT performance is evaluated by three physical parameters: superheat for the onset of nucleation boiling (ONB), heat transfer coefficient (HTC), and critical heat flux (CHF), which reflect the beginning of liquid–vapor phase transition, heat transfer efficiency, and capability, respectively. An ideal BHT interface requires lower superheat for ONB and higher HTC and CHF. To achieve lower superheat for ONB and higher HTC and CHF, several types of copper microfabrication technologies have been developed and commercialized, e.g ., micromachining, copper wire mesh welding, , copper powder sintering, and copper foam welding. However, these traditional microfabrication technologies cannot support the development of next-generation ultrathin (≤0.5 mm) high-performance vapor chambers, where the thickness of BHT interfaces needs to be below 50 μm and their BHT performance needs to be superior …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%