2008
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyploidization as a Retraction Force in Plant Genome Evolution: Sequence Rearrangements in Triticale

Abstract: BackgroundPolyploidization is a major evolutionary process in plants where hybridization and chromosome doubling induce enormous genomic stress and can generate genetic and epigenetic modifications. However, proper evaluation of DNA sequence restructuring events and the precise characterization of sequences involved are still sparse.Methodology/Principal FindingsInter Retrotransposons Amplified Polymorphism (IRAP), Retrotransposons Microsatellite Amplified Polymorphism (REMAP) and Inter Simple Sequence Repeat … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
88
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
88
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the japonica/indica somatic hybrids, LTR primers were used for IRAP assays, while for REMAP, these same primers were combined with the primers RM50R, RM202R, or RM202F (Tables 4 and 5). For the japonica/ wheat somatic hybrids, the IRAP assays described by Bento et al (2008) were used. All polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were resolved by electrophoresis on either 6% denaturing polyacrylamide or on 2% agarose gels.…”
Section: Marker Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the japonica/indica somatic hybrids, LTR primers were used for IRAP assays, while for REMAP, these same primers were combined with the primers RM50R, RM202R, or RM202F (Tables 4 and 5). For the japonica/ wheat somatic hybrids, the IRAP assays described by Bento et al (2008) were used. All polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were resolved by electrophoresis on either 6% denaturing polyacrylamide or on 2% agarose gels.…”
Section: Marker Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the cytological level, a common method is genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), a technique that is able to identify alien chromosomes and chromatin, as well as chromosomal rearrangements, especially those resulting from the formation of mosaic chromosomes (Gernand et al, 2005). At the DNA sequence level, various marker platforms have proven informative, especially those targeting retrotransposons (Bento et al, 2008;Kraitshtein et al, 2010). Several genomic variations induced by genomic shock from F1 to successful generations have been discovered (Feldman et al, 1997;Liu et al, 1998;Ozkan et al, 2001); however, the specific timing of the elimination is hard to establish in sexual hybrids because of the technical difficulty of collecting sufficient DNA for analytical purposes from very young zygotes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity of retrotransposons needs to be tightly controlled to ensure viability and survival of the host, and a major control step involves the inhibition of transcription. Reactivation of transposons has been observed either as a response to stress or to genomic shock (Bennetzen 2000;Liu and Wendel 2000;Kashkush et al 2002Kashkush et al , 2003Shan et al 2005Shan et al , 2009Bento et al 2008Bento et al , 2010. Our MSAP analysis of the introgression lines indicates that alteration in C methylation involves repetitive sequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Molecular marker techniques such as SSAP (Sequence-Specific Amplification Polymorphism) and the related IRAP (Inter-Retrotransposons Amplified Polymorphism) and the REMAP (Retrotransposon-Microsatellite Amplified Polymorphism) are based on retrotransposon activity, and are widely used today. The IRAP technique examines the polymorphism of retrotransposons themselves (Todorovska 2007) and largely confirmed absence of any intraspecific variation in wheat, rye and triticale (Bento et al 2008). Smýkal (2006) mentioned as the major advantage of IRAP (over the other methods used in pea) the high information content gained per single PCR analysis, which substantially cuts time and cost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%