2022
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2208275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polypill Strategy in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention

Abstract: BACKGROUNDA polypill that includes key medications associated with improved outcomes (aspirin, angiotensin-converting-enzyme [ACE] inhibitor, and statin) has been proposed as a simple approach to the secondary prevention of cardiovascular death and complications after myocardial infarction. METHODSIn this phase 3, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we assigned patients with myocardial infarction within the previous 6 months to a polypill-based strategy or usual care. The polypill treatment consisted of as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined pharmacological treatment is a common practice in secondary cardiovascular prevention, including in geriatric patients 4 and its benefits in morbidity and mortality are widely documented; 4 however, the complexity of the therapeutic regimen often means that: 1) Professionals tend not to implement a complete preventive regimen, with lack of adherence to clinical guidelines, 5 2) Professionals do not question the patient about their adherence to treatment 6 and, in turn, that 3) Patients show poor adherence to the therapeutic regimen with multiple medications; 3 in these cases adherence to the therapeutic regimen is usually low after 6 months after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 7 while the use of a polypill after this period reduces the rate of major cardiovascular events. 8,9 The consequences of this lack of therapeutic adherence are increase in the rate of major cardiovascular (CV) episodes 2 and, consequently, of morbidity and mortality in both primary and secondary prevention, non-adherence to the treatments of other related diseases, or its delayed diagnosis due to less frequent medical consultations (such as diabetes), all of which lead to an increase in the care burden and an increase in healthcare costs. Thus, therapeutic adherence is a key factor to ensure the sustainability of the healthcare system since non-adherence is linked to worse health outcomes and higher costs for the system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combined pharmacological treatment is a common practice in secondary cardiovascular prevention, including in geriatric patients 4 and its benefits in morbidity and mortality are widely documented; 4 however, the complexity of the therapeutic regimen often means that: 1) Professionals tend not to implement a complete preventive regimen, with lack of adherence to clinical guidelines, 5 2) Professionals do not question the patient about their adherence to treatment 6 and, in turn, that 3) Patients show poor adherence to the therapeutic regimen with multiple medications; 3 in these cases adherence to the therapeutic regimen is usually low after 6 months after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 7 while the use of a polypill after this period reduces the rate of major cardiovascular events. 8,9 The consequences of this lack of therapeutic adherence are increase in the rate of major cardiovascular (CV) episodes 2 and, consequently, of morbidity and mortality in both primary and secondary prevention, non-adherence to the treatments of other related diseases, or its delayed diagnosis due to less frequent medical consultations (such as diabetes), all of which lead to an increase in the care burden and an increase in healthcare costs. Thus, therapeutic adherence is a key factor to ensure the sustainability of the healthcare system since non-adherence is linked to worse health outcomes and higher costs for the system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…peripheral) 12 , diabetes with at least one RCV factor 12 , AMI with clinical signs of heart failure (when treatment begins 48 hours after the AMI) ▪ Secondary prevention after an acute myocardial infarction: reduction of mortality in the acute phase of myocardial infarction in patients with clinical signs of heart failure here when your treatment starts 48 hours after the acute myocardial infarction and when it is established up to 6 months later. 8,9 o Other evidence: ▪ Only telmisartan and ramipril are indicated to reduce RCV, based on the available clinical trials. 12 OPPORTUNITIES of the polypill: 12,18 the change to a polypill can increase the use of AAS and modify more favorably the levels of total cholesterol, 10 LDL-cholesterol, 10,29 HDL-cholesterol 10 and blood pressure 10,14 than in patients who were following treatment with three separate drugs, 30 especially in: patients with a history of non-adherence or who have any of the factors predictive of pharmacological non-adherence, patients who are not well controlled with equipotent doses and with problems of adherence, patients who are controlled with individual drugs, and patients with comorbidities and polymedicated patients.…”
Section: Composition and Indications Of Each Component Of The Polypillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a trial that randomly assigned nearly 2500 older patients with an MI in the prior six months to either a polypill (containing aspirin, ramipril, and atorvastatin) or usual care, those receiving a polypill had a lower rate of a composite of cardiovascular events (death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization; 9.5 versus 12.7 percent) over a mean of 36 months. 3 Blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and adverse events were similar between the two groups, and medication adherence was higher in the polypill group. While these DOI-10.1097/01.NPR.0000884884.08980.16 results are promising, further studies are needed to confi rm these fi ndings.…”
Section: Improved Outcomes and Adherence With A Polypill In Older Pat...mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This study randomized patients from seven different countries with MI within the previous 6 months to a fixed dose combination polypill consisting of aspirin (100 mg), rampril (2.5, 5, or 10 mg), and atorvastatin (20 or 40 mg) or standard care consisting of treatment according to current clinical guideline. The primary composite outcome was CV death, nonfatal type 1 MI, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization, and the key secondary endpoint was a composite of CV death, nonfatal type 1 MI, or nonfatal ischemic stroke [16].…”
Section: Study Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%