2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollution distribution in floodplain structure visualised by electrical resistivity imaging in the floodplain of the Litavka River, the Czech Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The river has a gradient of approximately 5 m/km and a single active channel, with no artificial source of pollution upstream before the control site. The river valley has a typical width of 100 m to 200 m and is relatively flat with abundant ditches ( Faměra et al ., 2018 ). Soil samples were collected in October 2021 from the surface horizon (0–20 cm) of each meadow using quadrat sampling ( Renčo and Čerevková, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The river has a gradient of approximately 5 m/km and a single active channel, with no artificial source of pollution upstream before the control site. The river valley has a typical width of 100 m to 200 m and is relatively flat with abundant ditches ( Faměra et al ., 2018 ). Soil samples were collected in October 2021 from the surface horizon (0–20 cm) of each meadow using quadrat sampling ( Renčo and Čerevková, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Příbram is a town in central Bohemia that is located 50 km to the south of Prague ( Figure 1 ). As a result of long-term ore mining and metallurgical activities, the area of the Litavka river alluvium is heavily polluted, with PTEs from three sources: (i) naturally increased metal content because of the specific composition of parent rocks, (ii) atmospheric deposition from a smelter, and (iii) floods of water polluted with metal-processing wastes [ 30 , 31 ]. According to the World reference base of soil resources [ 32 ], soils of the area are predominantly characterized as Fluvisols, Gleysols, and, in areas that are slightly elevated relative to the alluvium, Cambisols.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) sediments in abandoned meanders and laterally shifting channels that have evolved, i.e., were filled with sediment during the U-mining climax (1971)(1972)(1973)(1974)(1975)(1976)(1977)(1978)(1979)(1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989); these features can be identified with GIS analysis, in particular using old maps, aerial photographs and DTM; (2) other sediment traps in the floodplain, such as meander scars (more ancient channels not depicted in old maps [24]); and (3) certain young (recently built) levees; these locations can be identified with DTM on the external banks of meander bends and by "sedimentary facies mapping", i.e., mapping sediment grain-size in the floodplain, because they exhibit lower Al/Si and/or higher Zr/Rb ratios in the Ploučnice River floodplain. All three of these types of polluted sediment traps represent lithological and topographical heterogeneities, which can also be visualised by geophysical imaging [9,10,24]. However, the tools reported in this paper are sufficient for identification and interpretation of pollution hotspots in the studied floodplains and can thus be applicable to any polluted floodplain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Using a portable (global positioning system (GPS) coupled with geophysical imaging, particularly for methods acquiring electrical resistivity, has saved a large amount of work associated with identifying subsurface sediment bodies within a floodplain, which has considerably facilitated floodplain studies [7,8]. The performance of electrical resistivity imaging in floodplain studies has been demonstrated in previous works [9][10][11][12]. Since the beginning of the 21st century, precise digital terrain models produced from airborne laser scanning (LIDAR) data most commonly used for fluvial geomorphologic evaluation [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation