2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-018-1526-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen morphology in Brazilian species of Gloxiniinae (Gesneriaceae): variation in apertures and pattern of ornamentation

Abstract: Gloxiniinae comprises herbs and subshrubs usually growing on rocky outcrops, rocky fields or gallery forests. For Gesneriaceae in some cases variations in pollen morphology allow the differentiation of genera and species. We studied the pollen grains of ten Brazilian species of Gloxiniinae (Gesneriaceae), including the genera Chautemsia, Gloxinia, Goyazia, Mandirola and Seemannia with the purposes of describing the pollen morphology of these genera, and contributing to the taxonomic characterization of the gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Means ( x ), standard error ( SE ), maximal (max), and minimal (min) was calculated based on pollen grains quantitative features measurements according to De Souza, de Araujo, Chautems, da Cruz‐Barros, and Gasparino (2018). To verify if the quantitative data of the pollen grains allowed species grouping, cluster analysis (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean [UPGMA] and Euclidean distance) was performed using the programs PAST3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Means ( x ), standard error ( SE ), maximal (max), and minimal (min) was calculated based on pollen grains quantitative features measurements according to De Souza, de Araujo, Chautems, da Cruz‐Barros, and Gasparino (2018). To verify if the quantitative data of the pollen grains allowed species grouping, cluster analysis (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean [UPGMA] and Euclidean distance) was performed using the programs PAST3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%