Political Ideology Modifies the Effect of Glass Cliff Candidacies on Election Outcomes for Women in American State Legislative Races (2011–2016)

Abstract

Research on glass cliff political candidacies shows that compared to men, women are more likely to run for office in districts where they are likely to lose. We examined if party differences in whether female candidates face these worse conditions in the United States could account for persistent and growing party and state variation in women’s representation. Using election data from 2011 to 2016, we compared Republican versus Democratic candidacies at the state legislative level. We found that women in both parties faced glass cliffs in House races, but not in the Senate. For Republican women, glass cliff conditions accounted for worse election outcomes, but Democratic women were more likely to win when these conditions were considered. Variation in party by state measures of glass cliff effects were also found to explain state variation in women’s office holding. We found that for Democrats, more women win when more women run, but for Republicans, more women win only when the seats they face are more winnable. These results point to the role of polarized traditional versus progressive political ideologies in structuring the motives which underlie glass cliff conditions for women in politics, suggesting that practical solutions be tailored to party. To overcome the growing gap in women’s representation, current efforts to increase the quantity of women running would be complemented by a focus on improving the quality of contests they face, with Republican women most likely to benefit. Further research attending to the multiple sources of variation which impact gendered election outcomes can inform more targeted solutions for advancing equality. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684321992046

The who, when, and why of the glass cliff phenomenon: A meta-analysis of appointments to precarious leadership positions.

“…2Two studies (Bowles, 2013; Robinson, 2019) reported a mix of continuous and dichotomous predictor variables. In these cases, we only used the continuous variables.…”

“…10Because of large variability in sample sizes, three effect sizes (Funk, 2017; Robinson, 2019; Sun, Zhu, & Ye, 2015) had more weight in the analysis than all of the other studies combined. A sensitivity analysis excluding these three studies did not substantially change the summary effect size ( g = .07) or the results of the moderation analyses.…”

Testing Work–Life Theory in Marketing: Evidence from Field Experiments on Social Media

“…If two people face similar work and life demands, the one with fewer resources experiences more work-life conflict (Kossek and Lee 2017) but also might benefit more from work-life enrichment. For example, people with conservative views generally subscribe to more traditional gender roles, in which men are breadwinners and leaders and women are caretakers and homemakers (Robinson et al 2021). If conservative working women face the same work demands as socially liberal working women, but they have more constrained life-based resources because they shoulder more responsibility at home, they may experience more work-life conflict than their liberal counterparts (Geist 2005).…”

A quantitative analysis of motivations of association executives to earn the certified association executive credential

“…Female respondents to the survey seem to recognize this potential benefit in the CAE certification program. The results underscore the need to understand that female association professionals view the certification as a means of breaking through the glass ceiling (Ayub et al, 2019;Mungaray & Curtin, 2021;Parmer, 2021) and avoiding the glass cliff (Morgenroth et al, 2020;Rhode, 2017;Robinson et al, 2021;Ryan & Haslam, 2005) The CAE certification can provide employers an opportunity to offer advancement options that seem to elude many women in the current professional environment.…”

“…Women in senior leadership positions also face a "glass cliff" that makes their grasp on management positions much more tenuous than their male counterparts. The glass cliff represents the concept of women and minorities advancing to leadership positions with a disproportionate chance of failure (Morgenroth et al, 2020;Rhode, 2017;Robinson et al, 2021;Ryan & Haslam, 2005). Many times, the perilous nature of the position is due to the woman appointed during a time of crisis (Glass & Cook, 2020;Morgenroth et al, 2020;Ryan & Haslam, 2005).…”