2016
DOI: 10.7227/r.19.2.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Action Beyond Resistance: Arendt and “Revolutionary Spirit” in Egypt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We must also note that, though fiercely resistant to establishing politics in natural and quasi-natural criteria, Arendt (1998: 50–58) emphasizes a politically engaged care for the world in which individuals act and attain their public identities. By highlighting a rootedness solidified through public remembrance and organized communities, Arendt’s thinking differs from the poststructuralist rendition of subjectivity in which individuals have no agency over their identity construction (Hyvönen, 2016: 201–205; Lang, 2005: 223; Villa, 1992). That said, Arendt would undoubtedly find problematic the overly deterministic aspect of mainstream international theories arguing that no central authority exists among sovereign states and that this immutable anarchic status of international politics brings states into constant security competition (Baehr, 2010: 14–26; Barder and McCourt, 2010; Williams, 2005: 6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We must also note that, though fiercely resistant to establishing politics in natural and quasi-natural criteria, Arendt (1998: 50–58) emphasizes a politically engaged care for the world in which individuals act and attain their public identities. By highlighting a rootedness solidified through public remembrance and organized communities, Arendt’s thinking differs from the poststructuralist rendition of subjectivity in which individuals have no agency over their identity construction (Hyvönen, 2016: 201–205; Lang, 2005: 223; Villa, 1992). That said, Arendt would undoubtedly find problematic the overly deterministic aspect of mainstream international theories arguing that no central authority exists among sovereign states and that this immutable anarchic status of international politics brings states into constant security competition (Baehr, 2010: 14–26; Barder and McCourt, 2010; Williams, 2005: 6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%