2006
DOI: 10.1080/03050060600628694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policies for disadvantaged children under scrutiny: the Dutch policy compared with policies in France, England, Flanders and the USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the evaluations of the USA programmes initially showed that the influence of the children's home environment outweighed that of the school programmes by far, and that the compensatory programmes were doomed to be, and in fact were, ineffective. Later, more sophisticated studies indicated that there were positive effects of compensatory programmes, although they were small and were evident only in the early years (for example, Day et al 1997;Karsten 2006).…”
Section: An International Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the evaluations of the USA programmes initially showed that the influence of the children's home environment outweighed that of the school programmes by far, and that the compensatory programmes were doomed to be, and in fact were, ineffective. Later, more sophisticated studies indicated that there were positive effects of compensatory programmes, although they were small and were evident only in the early years (for example, Day et al 1997;Karsten 2006).…”
Section: An International Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of course, schools in England that serve large proportions of disadvantaged pupils receive extra resources (often in the form of extra teachers, for example) as an increase in the standard allocation given to finance schools. England, however, has additional policies that serve disadvantaged pupils by (1) targeting extra funding to impoverished areas (or groups of schools) and (2) rewarding innovative ideas at the local level with grant money (EC, 2000;Karsten, 2006). The Eurydice report does an excellent job of highlighting the differences between these policies in various countries and indicating which are most prevalent.…”
Section: Current and New Understandings Of Models For Targeted Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, two key studies, one by Eurydice, the European Commission's Information Network on Education in Europe, and the other by Dutch researcher Sjoerd Karsten, have attempted to describe different European models for targeting additional funding (that provided on top of a general allocation for school funding) to students with special needs (EC, 2000;Karsten, 2006). While these studies are both explicitly concerned with the manners in which resources are targeted to socio-economically disadvantaged youth, they also provide useful lenses for viewing the policy mechanisms in place for delivering targeted resources to students with various other special needs.…”
Section: Current and New Understandings Of Models For Targeted Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These measures fall within the category of the "classic" positive discrimination programmes. Other studies have already explained (Karsten, 2006) that these programmes have only had limited success in recent decades.…”
Section: Conclusion: Policies Concerning Desegregationmentioning
confidence: 99%