Polaroid Photoscreening for Amblyogenic Factors

Evaluating photoscreeners II: MTI and Fortune videorefractor

“…This study population had an average age of 26 months, which is a younger population than previously reported for the MTI or the VRB photoscreener. Published studies indicate that they may be useful vision‐screening tools in an older population 13 , 16 , 21 , 22 . However, the results from this trial do not support the use of either of these photoscreeners as vision‐screening tools in early childhood.…”

Evaluating photoscreeners II: MTI and Fortune videorefractor

“…This study population had an average age of 26 months, which is a younger population than previously reported for the MTI or the VRB photoscreener. Published studies indicate that they may be useful vision‐screening tools in an older population 13 , 16 , 21 , 22 . However, the results from this trial do not support the use of either of these photoscreeners as vision‐screening tools in early childhood.…”

A Systematic Review of Current Teleophthalmology Services in New Zealand Compared to the Four Comparable Countries of the United Kingdom, Australia, United States of America (USA) and Canada

“……”

Efficiency of a video-autorefractometer used as a screening device for amblyogenic factors

“…Other amblyogenic factors like strabismus or optical opacities were not evaluated. Previous studies [9,16,21,23] have reported high efficiency in detecting these pathologies by photorefraction.…”

“…Freedman et al [9] reported a sensitivity of 66% and 53% respectively with a two-flash device. Difficulty in measuring astigmatism using oneand two-flash photorefractometers is well known [26].…”

Evaluating photoscreeners II: MTI and Fortune videorefractor

“…This study population had an average age of 26 months, which is a younger population than previously reported for the MTI or the VRB photoscreener. Published studies indicate that they may be useful vision‐screening tools in an older population 13 , 16 , 21 , 22 . However, the results from this trial do not support the use of either of these photoscreeners as vision‐screening tools in early childhood.…”

A Systematic Review of Current Teleophthalmology Services in New Zealand Compared to the Four Comparable Countries of the United Kingdom, Australia, United States of America (USA) and Canada

“……”

Efficiency of a video-autorefractometer used as a screening device for amblyogenic factors

“…Other amblyogenic factors like strabismus or optical opacities were not evaluated. Previous studies [9,16,21,23] have reported high efficiency in detecting these pathologies by photorefraction.…”

“…Freedman et al [9] reported a sensitivity of 66% and 53% respectively with a two-flash device. Difficulty in measuring astigmatism using oneand two-flash photorefractometers is well known [26].…”

Evaluating photoscreeners II: MTI and Fortune videorefractor

“…This study population had an average age of 26 months, which is a younger population than previously reported for the MTI or the VRB photoscreener. Published studies indicate that they may be useful vision‐screening tools in an older population 13 , 16 , 21 , 22 . However, the results from this trial do not support the use of either of these photoscreeners as vision‐screening tools in early childhood.…”

A Systematic Review of Current Teleophthalmology Services in New Zealand Compared to the Four Comparable Countries of the United Kingdom, Australia, United States of America (USA) and Canada

“……”

Efficiency of a video-autorefractometer used as a screening device for amblyogenic factors

“…Other amblyogenic factors like strabismus or optical opacities were not evaluated. Previous studies [9,16,21,23] have reported high efficiency in detecting these pathologies by photorefraction.…”

“…Freedman et al [9] reported a sensitivity of 66% and 53% respectively with a two-flash device. Difficulty in measuring astigmatism using oneand two-flash photorefractometers is well known [26].…”