Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the ACL - ACL '06 2006
DOI: 10.3115/1220175.1220193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarized unification grammars

Abstract: This paper proposes a generic mathematical formalism for the combination of various structures: strings, trees, dags, graphs and products of them. The polarization of the objects of the elementary structures controls the saturation of the final structure. This formalism is both elementary and powerful enough to strongly simulate many grammar formalisms, such as rewriting systems, dependency grammars, TAG, HPSG and LFG.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The grammar combination operation of PUG was indeed conjectured to be associative (Kahane and Lareau, 2005;Kahane, 2006). The present paper makes two main contributions: In the next section we show that the combination operation defined above is not associative.…”
Section: Tree Combination In Pugmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The grammar combination operation of PUG was indeed conjectured to be associative (Kahane and Lareau, 2005;Kahane, 2006). The present paper makes two main contributions: In the next section we show that the combination operation defined above is not associative.…”
Section: Tree Combination In Pugmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The grammar combination operation of PUG was conjectured to be associative (Kahane and Lareau, 2005;Kahane, 2006). In this paper we show that it is not; even attaching polarities to objects does not render grammar combination order-independent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations