2007
DOI: 10.1029/2006rs003488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarity asymmetry of sprite‐producing lightning: A paradox?

Abstract: [1] Sprites and halos in the mesosphere are produced electrostatically by lightning ground flashes whose polarity is positive, by a margin of at least 1000 to 1 in collected observations. The initiation of these events is controlled by the vertical charge moment change of the flash. Schumann resonance ELF methods have been used to measure the charge moments of millions of flashes worldwide. The bipolar distributions of these events show stronger positive than negative tails, consistent with the predominance of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
148
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(98 reference statements)
18
148
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in this paper shed additional light on the paradox raised by Williams et al (2007a) regarding the polarity asymmetry of sprite-producing lightning strokes. Their survey based on ground-based observations reported worldwide prior to 2005, including more than 3000 sprites documented in ground-based video imagery, indicates that the percentage of confirmative negative sprite observations is far below 1% (this ratio will increase to approximately 4% even those invalidated cases are included), which is inconsistent with the inferred proportion of negative sprites on the order of 10% from the Schumann resonance measurement (e.g., Hobara et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The results presented in this paper shed additional light on the paradox raised by Williams et al (2007a) regarding the polarity asymmetry of sprite-producing lightning strokes. Their survey based on ground-based observations reported worldwide prior to 2005, including more than 3000 sprites documented in ground-based video imagery, indicates that the percentage of confirmative negative sprite observations is far below 1% (this ratio will increase to approximately 4% even those invalidated cases are included), which is inconsistent with the inferred proportion of negative sprites on the order of 10% from the Schumann resonance measurement (e.g., Hobara et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Neubert et al, 2008;Pasco, 2010;Raizer et al, 2010). The polarity asymmetry of sprite-producing lightning (Boccippio et al, 1995;Lyons, 2006;Williams et al, 2007), as well as the fact that the charge moment change of the causative +CG must be greater than ∼500 C km to produce sprites (Stanley et al, 2000;, is far from being well understood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially for all events, the sprite generation is associated with a positive flash (Boccippio et al, 1995;Williams et al, 2007). Just after a positive CG return stroke, the uncompensated negative charge of the thundercloud results in the generation of downwarddirected electric field over the thundercloud.…”
Section: V Surkov and M Hayakawa: Underlying Mechanisms Of Transmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations