2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pmh56 Patient Reported Outcomes (Pro) Collected as Part of the Clinical Process: The Challenge of Administering, Scoring, Storing, and Interpreting PHQ-9 Scores Beyond the Clinical Moment

Abstract: AC, p,0.001). In the last 12 months 36% SC patients had been hospitalized vs 16% AC (p,0.001) and had mean of 2.3 vs 2.0 (p=0.007) comorbidities respectively. Poorvery poor Q-LES-Q overall life satisfaction was reported by 24% SC patients and 11% AC (p,0.001) with overall scores of 49.7 and 56.2 (p,0.001) respectively. Poorer quality of life was also reported through mean EQ5D VAS scores (64.6 SC vs 68.9 AC p=0.01). Patients reported mean WPAI percentages of 34.2 SC vs 31.0 AC for overall work impairment (p=0.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Change on CGI-S scale has strong face validity, and the usefulness of this measurement approach is reflected in many disorder-specific CGI scales being introduced into clinical trials and observational studies, among them the CGI for schizophrenia (CGI-SCH), 20 for bipolar disorder (CGI-BP), 21,23 and more recently, for schizoaffective disorder (CGI-S-SCA). 22 Although not yet widely used by clinicians, 24 the integration of measurement tools such as MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9 into routine psychiatric management may enhance the quality of care and improve clinical outcomes. 25 Clinician-rated and/ or patient-rated scales can help characterize the trajectory of the disease course and the effects of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Change on CGI-S scale has strong face validity, and the usefulness of this measurement approach is reflected in many disorder-specific CGI scales being introduced into clinical trials and observational studies, among them the CGI for schizophrenia (CGI-SCH), 20 for bipolar disorder (CGI-BP), 21,23 and more recently, for schizoaffective disorder (CGI-S-SCA). 22 Although not yet widely used by clinicians, 24 the integration of measurement tools such as MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9 into routine psychiatric management may enhance the quality of care and improve clinical outcomes. 25 Clinician-rated and/ or patient-rated scales can help characterize the trajectory of the disease course and the effects of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%