2019
DOI: 10.14763/2019.4.1421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platform ad archives: promises and pitfalls

Abstract: This paper discusses the new phenomenon of platform ad archives. Over the past year, leading social media platforms have installed publicly accessible databases documenting their political advertisements, and several countries have moved to regulate them. If designed and implemented properly, ad archives can correct for structural informational asymmetries in the online advertising industry, and thereby improve accountability through litigation and through publicity. However, present implementations leave much… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these databases offer a glimpse into the strategy and funding sources of online advertisements, scholars have rightly critiqued their architectures as providing insufficient levels of transparency (Leerssen et al, 2019). Chief among the flaws of existing ad archives is their keyword search requirement: a deliberate design choice that prevents users from accessing aggregate-level data.…”
Section: Introduction Of New Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these databases offer a glimpse into the strategy and funding sources of online advertisements, scholars have rightly critiqued their architectures as providing insufficient levels of transparency (Leerssen et al, 2019). Chief among the flaws of existing ad archives is their keyword search requirement: a deliberate design choice that prevents users from accessing aggregate-level data.…”
Section: Introduction Of New Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Ad Library opens up a data stream for analyzing political ads, several scholars have noted shortcomings that directly impact research. Leerssen, Ausloos, Zarouali, Helberger, and de Vreese (2018) critique the Ad Library along the vagaries of defining a "political" ad, its verification processes, and a lack of detail regarding targeting practices. Bossetta (2020) further highlights how the Ad Library's search requirement limits scholars' understanding of political advertising at an aggregate level.…”
Section: Theoretical Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facebook's Ad Library 12 , for example, is an attempt to introduce carefully designed observability, here with regard to (political) advertisement. Despite the limitations of the existing setup (see Leerssen et al, 2019) Larsson, 2016) to crisis communication during disasters (e.g. Bruns & Burgess, 2014), as well as the technical mechanisms behind ranking and recommendation (e.g., Airoldi et al, 2016;Rieder et al, 2018).…”
Section: Observe Platform Behaviour Over Timementioning
confidence: 99%