2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782011005000064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastocrono e número final de nós de cultivares de soja em função da época de semeadura

Abstract: Plastochron and final node number of soybean cultivars as a function of sowing date

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
10
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar values of plastochron between different cultivars were also obtained in soybean by Martins et al (2011), where estimated values for two crop seasons, did not differ from each other. The similarity of plastochron between grapevine cultivars, indicates that a single value for both plastochron for both cultivars may be used.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Similar values of plastochron between different cultivars were also obtained in soybean by Martins et al (2011), where estimated values for two crop seasons, did not differ from each other. The similarity of plastochron between grapevine cultivars, indicates that a single value for both plastochron for both cultivars may be used.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Firstly reducing the number of nodes of the main stem may by a response to photoperiod, as a plant is responsive to photoperiod (DAJUE & MÜNDEL, 1996). Variations in the number of nodes related to photoperiod were also found in soybeans (MARTINS et al, 2011). Second by reducing the number of branches from the lowest to the highest density, represented by a linear decrease in the number of nodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…From these data, linear regressions were established between the number of leaves (NL) and number of branches (NB), respectively, with TTa, for each evaluation. The values of phyllochron and plastochron consisted of the value of the inverse relationship of the coefficient of linear regression generated between NL and TTa (phyllochron) and NB and TT (plastochron), as also used by Martins, Reis, and Pinheiro (2012), and Martins, Radons, Streck, Knies, and Carlesso (2011), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%