Plasticity in One Hemisphere, Control From Two: Adaptation in Descending Motor Pathways After Unilateral Corticospinal Injury in Neonatal Rats

Abstract

After injury to the corticospinal tract (CST) in early development there is large-scale adaptation of descending motor pathways. Some studies suggest the uninjured hemisphere controls the impaired forelimb, while others suggest that the injured hemisphere does; these pathways have never been compared directly. We tested the contribution of each motor cortex to the recovery forelimb function after neonatal injury of the CST. We cut the left pyramid (pyramidotomy) of postnatal day 7 rats, which caused a measurable impairment of the right forelimb. We used pharmacological inactivation of each motor cortex to test its contribution to a skilled reach and supination task. Rats with neonatal pyramidotomy were further impaired by inactivation of motor cortex in both the injured and the uninjured hemispheres, while the forelimb of uninjured rats was impaired only from the contralateral motor cortex. Thus, inactivation demonstrated motor control from each motor cortex. In contrast, physiological and anatomical interrogation of these pathways support adaptations only in the uninjured hemisphere. Intracortical microstimulation of motor cortex in the uninjured hemisphere of rats with neonatal pyramidotomy produced responses from both forelimbs, while stimulation of the injured hemisphere did not elicit responses from either forelimb. Both anterograde and retrograde tracers were used to label corticofugal pathways. There was no increased plasticity from the injured hemisphere, either from cortex to the red nucleus or the red nucleus to the spinal cord. In contrast, there were very strong CST connections to both halves of the spinal cord from the uninjured motor cortex. Retrograde tracing produced maps of each forelimb within the uninjured hemisphere, and these were partly segregated. This suggests that the uninjured hemisphere may encode separate control of the unimpaired and the impaired forelimbs of rats with neonatal pyramidotomy.

Crossing nerve transfer drives sensory input–dependent plasticity for motor recovery after brain injury

“…Consistent with previous studies, the motor representation of the right forelimb in the TBI + sham group with spontaneous recovery was mapped to the RFA ( Fig. 3, F and H ) ( 16 , 21 ). However, in the TBI + CC7 group, the contralateral cortex showed a wide range of response areas, including the RFA and CFA, at 8 weeks after surgery.…”

Spinal cord associative plasticity improves forelimb sensorimotor function after cervical injury

“…2A2), which can be inactivated by its ligand, clozapine-N-oxide (CNO) 18, 19 . One week after AAV injections, animals were trained on the vermicelli handling task 20, 21 . After reaching a stable baseline performance, the number of forepaw manipulations was measured before, during, and after inactivation (Fig.…”

A New Tool for the Analysis of the Effect of Intracerebrally Injected Anti-Amyloid-β Compounds

“…Considering the limited size of these regions, quantification of A␤ plaques and evaluation of a potential treatment are less complex, especially if the target tissue has not been traumatized [32][33][34][35]. Other quantitative methods require homogenized brain tissue, e.g., ELISA or western blot, or the separation of both hemispheres of the brain to perform immunohistochemistry or biochemical studies [36][37][38]. However, these methods can provide a complete visual comparison of the distribution of plaques between the control and the injected hemisphere, further determining the possible distribution of treatment.…”