Plasmapheresis in Neurological Disorders: Frequency and Type of Adverse Effects Associated with this Procedure in Atertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan

Abstract

Objective: To determine the frequency and type of adverse effects associated with plasmapheresis among the patients with neurological disorders at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.
 Study Design: Prospective longitudinal study.
 Place and Duration of Study: Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jan to Jun 2019.
 Methodology: The sample population comprised 150 patients with various neurological disorders requiring plasmapheresis at a tertiary care hospital in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The consultant neuro physician diagnosed the underlying disorder, and a management plan of plasmapheresis was given after the departmental meeting. The presence of adverse effects was observed during the session of plasmapheresis till 48 hours after the session.
 Results: Out of 150 patients with neurological illness undergoing plasmapheresis at our department, 18 (12%) developed one or more adverse effects due to the procedure, while 132 (88%) did not experience any adverse effects. The mean age of the patients was 30.2 ± 2.698 years. GB syndrome 61 (40.6%) was the commonest disease for which plasmapheresis was done. Allergic reaction 4 (2.6%) was the commonest side effect among the patients undergoing plasmapheresis, followed by abdominal pain 3 (2%). 146 (97.4%) patients were shifted toward, and 4 (2.6%) required intensive care unit admission after the procedure due to complications. Mortality due to this procedure was nil in the given period.
 Conclusion: Plasmapheresis is a relatively safe procedure for neurological illnesses with an immunological basis. Patients should be told about the common adverse effects they could face during the procedure especially allergic reactions and...

Complications of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in pediatric patients: An experience at a tertiary care hospital

“…In spite of their lack of resources and experience, developing nations have been employing it successfully. 8 Mazahir et al reported that most of the indications were renal diseases. The difference in indications of TPE is likely due to difference in each centers’ specific subspecialties, center-specific patient selection criteria and classifications.…”