Henriksen [1] did not refute the belief [2] that lack of confidence in the filtration theory [3] may have contributed to the fact that Starling never received full recognition, nor the possibility that oscillating capillary pressure (P c ), capillary pulse pressure (CPP) of vasodilatation [4,5] may facilitate transport of plasma protein [2] by two-pore endothelia (Figure 1) of capillaries. Oddities of protein clearance from plasma (i) might be elucidated by CPP (ii, iii).(i) Michel & Curry [6] wondered why albumin clearance in intact rat muscle [7] was ,onetenth of that in isolated rat hindquarters (limbs) [8]. At low venous pressure (P V ), clearance can be calculated to have increased in the order, rat muscle [7,9], dog paw [10], muscle of plasma volume-expanded rats [9], all in intact animals and (increase ,7-fold) isolated rat limbs [8]. Clearance increased gradually at a moderate rise of P V , very strongly at P V ,50 mmHg ([8,10] incl. original data) but it was almost 10 times higher in the isolated limbs [8].(ii) Starling [3] deduced that high P c induced transudation (of low-protein fluid), while at diminished P c , serum colloid osmotic pressure (COP s ) absorbed salt solution from tissue fluid until its concentration of protein (C protein ) and COP t(issue) increased to check absorption. Might the explanation reside in two sets of pores ( Figure 1)? Small pores of the glycocalyx which lines the luminal side of endothelial cells, fenestrae and cell junctions permit filtration of very low-protein fluid, while very sparse large pores offer little resistance to convection of protein [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Increase of COP t seems to oppose absorption at small pore ( Figure 1B) and fenestral exits [11]. Intermittent increase of P c ( Figure 1BRA) at vasomotion may clean exits and permit ensuing absorption of low-protein fluid [6, cf. 11], which ought to increase tissue C protein .Tight junctions between endothelial cells (not in Figure 1) make filtration less sensitive to tissue COP t than suspected, but reabsorption (arrow in Figure 12 turned 180˚) of fluid was not studied [12]. Levick commented that reabsorption may be opposed by increase of COP t at pore exits (so) rapidly [11] that the high frequency of change of P c in CPP seems relevant.