2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant response to evapotranspiration and soil water sensor irrigation scheduling methods for papaya production in south Florida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason of this phenomenon was mainly for the amount of evaporation and drainage below root zone in silty loam soil were larger than silty clay loam and silty clay soils, which indicated more irrigation water and less interval between irrigation and sowing were necessary in field with silty loam soil. However, constraint conditions for determining optimal irrigation strategy would be more complicate if we focus on the whole crop growth period for some other factors such as root water uptake and water and salt stress should be taken into consideration [39,40]. Although in conditions of before sowing like our study, factors such as field slope, farming practices (eg tillage, no tillage, and plastic mulched) will also affect the soil water, salt, and NO 3 --N distributions after irrigation [41] and these might be 2D/3D issues and will be studied in our future work.…”
Section: Irrigation Strategies Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason of this phenomenon was mainly for the amount of evaporation and drainage below root zone in silty loam soil were larger than silty clay loam and silty clay soils, which indicated more irrigation water and less interval between irrigation and sowing were necessary in field with silty loam soil. However, constraint conditions for determining optimal irrigation strategy would be more complicate if we focus on the whole crop growth period for some other factors such as root water uptake and water and salt stress should be taken into consideration [39,40]. Although in conditions of before sowing like our study, factors such as field slope, farming practices (eg tillage, no tillage, and plastic mulched) will also affect the soil water, salt, and NO 3 --N distributions after irrigation [41] and these might be 2D/3D issues and will be studied in our future work.…”
Section: Irrigation Strategies Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Israel, Meron et al (2001) reported that irrigating apple (Malus domestica) at a soil suction of 15-25 kPa resulted in annual water saving of 500-650 mm compared with ET-based irrigation scheduling. For papaya in calcareous soil of southern Florida, Migliaccio et al (2010) reported water savings of 64-69% using automated tensiometers set at 10, 15, or 25 kPa compared with irrigating based on a set schedule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Practices that enhance fertilizer utilization efficiency include appropriate timing of fertilizer applications, formulation of the fertilizer material, amount and rate of fertilizer applied, and methods used to apply fertilizers. Efficient irrigation methods such as irrigating based on crop evapotranspiration (ET) or soil water sensors minimize over-irrigation while not affecting yields (Silva et al 2009;Migliaccio et al 2010) and subsequently reducing nutrient leaching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An electromagnetic sensor to measure soil moisture was the basis for developing an irrigation system at a savings of 53% of water compared with irrigation by sprinklers in an area of 1000m 2 of pasture [4]. A reduction in water use under scheduled systems also have been achieved, using soil sensor and an evaporimeter, which allowed for the adjustment of irrigation to the daily fluctuations in weather or volumetric substrate moisture content [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%