2017
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbw135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant genome and transcriptome annotations: from misconceptions to simple solutions

Abstract: Next-generation sequencing has triggered an explosion of available genomic and transcriptomic resources in the plant sciences. Although genome and transcriptome sequencing has become orders of magnitudes cheaper and more efficient, often the functional annotation process is lagging behind. This might be hampered by the lack of a comprehensive enumeration of simple-to-use tools available to the plant researcher. In this comprehensive review, we present (i) typical ontologies to be used in the plant sciences, (i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to using established techniques such as BUSCO, comparing the whole plant gene set data against the backdrop of closely related species promises to become a versatile tool (Bolger et al, 2017) and the comparison can be largely automated (Lohse et al, 2014;Lyons and Freeling, 2008).…”
Section: Genome Assemblies Made Cheaper and Easiermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to using established techniques such as BUSCO, comparing the whole plant gene set data against the backdrop of closely related species promises to become a versatile tool (Bolger et al, 2017) and the comparison can be largely automated (Lohse et al, 2014;Lyons and Freeling, 2008).…”
Section: Genome Assemblies Made Cheaper and Easiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the genomes of ;200 plant species have been published (www.plabipd.de) (Bolger et al, 2017), yet sequencing plant genomes remains comparatively difficult due to their large sizes and high repeat content (Jiao and Schneeberger, 2017). Long-range data are extremely valuable for resolving repetitive genomic regions and several new technologies have made substantial advances in this area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assembled transcriptomes selected as references for differential gene expression (TRINITY guided , see criteria later) was annotated using Trinotate, a pipeline for functional annotation of transcriptomes (Bolger, Arsova, & Usadel, 2017). First, similarities to known proteins were detected by a BLASTX search (Camacho et al, 2009) (e ≤ 1e−5) against two comprehensive protein databases: Swiss-Prot (Boeckmann et al, 2005) and UniRef90 (The UniProt Consortium, 2015) obtained from UniProt (available on Mar 8, 2018).…”
Section: Functional Annotation and Identification Of Contaminants Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many tools available that automatically annotate genes using ontologies such as the Mercator automated annotation tool (Lohse et al ., ), BLAST2GO (Conesa and Gotz, ), KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS) (Moriya et al ., ), and TRAPID (Van Bel et al ., ) (reviewed in Bolger et al ., 2017a). The overarching goal of these tools is the rapid automatic annotation of genes to a high standard, approaching that of manual annotation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%