2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0179-2_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Epigenetic Stress Memory Induced by Drought: A Physiological and Molecular Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have demonstrated that ABA may contribute to increased drought tolerance related to drought memory effect [39,40]. The stomata of plants, which have once been exposed to drought stress, may also remain partially closed during the recovery period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have demonstrated that ABA may contribute to increased drought tolerance related to drought memory effect [39,40]. The stomata of plants, which have once been exposed to drought stress, may also remain partially closed during the recovery period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants can control their responses to repeated stress by altering the expression patterns of the responsive genes. A subset of genes called 'memory genes' are expressed at highly elevated or reduced levels during subsequent dehydration events (Ding et al, 2012;Kinoshita and Seki, 2014;Godwin and Farrona, 2020), thereby enabling plants to respond more promptly and strongly to the repeated drought stress. This response has been referred to as memory, imprinting, priming, training, and acclimation to stress (Bruce et al, 2007;Conrath, 2011;Walter et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In transgenic plants, stress-inducible genes such as LEA, HSPs, AREB/ABFs, bZIPs contributed to enhanced stress tolerance (Ali et al, 2017). In model plants, epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation, and histone modifications, involved in stress responses are reported (Munshi et al, 2015;Mozgova et al, 2019;Godwin and Farrona, 2020); however, studies in field crops are limited (Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%