2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning and optimising DIEP flaps with virtual surgery: the Navarra experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
55
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator (DIEP) flap for example, computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has become widely used to map both the arterial and venous anatomy of the abdominal wall, including the presence, size and course of DIEA perforators, and the dominance of superficial or deep venous systems in the venous drainage of the flap [7,9]. In fact, this imaging can aid in the selection of the hemi-abdominal wall of choice, the perforator of choice and map all features of surgical dissection as 'virtual surgery'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator (DIEP) flap for example, computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has become widely used to map both the arterial and venous anatomy of the abdominal wall, including the presence, size and course of DIEA perforators, and the dominance of superficial or deep venous systems in the venous drainage of the flap [7,9]. In fact, this imaging can aid in the selection of the hemi-abdominal wall of choice, the perforator of choice and map all features of surgical dissection as 'virtual surgery'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These communications (Boscillating veins^between the adjacent venous territories) [15] may be the limiting factor to venous drainage. The use of preoperative imaging to demonstrate the presence and calibre of these communications may be a useful tool for aiding perforator selection and for maximizing venous outflow [20]. As such, an SIEV greater than 1.5 mm in diameter can be considered a dominant superficial system vein, and a perforating vein greater than 1 mm in diameter is a dominant DIEV perforator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This study has expanded that analysis to include a wide range of surgical scars, particularly those seen in the cohort of patients undergoing lower abdominal flaps for breast reconstruction. Although CTA has become increasingly utilized prior to all cases of perforator flap surgery, as a tool to evaluating ''normal'' individual variability and anatomical variation (Rozen et al, 2008c), this study has shown that variation may be even more pronounced in cases of previous surgery. Although CTA is associated with radiation exposure and a risk of uncommon complications, it has been shown in multiple international studies to significantly improve operative outcomes in abdominal free flap surgery (Rozen et al, 2008a;Smit et al, 2008;Uppal et al, 2008;Casey et al, 2009), and this paper further contributes to these benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%