2014
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planned and Reactive Agility Performance in Semiprofessional and Amateur Basketball Players

Abstract: The results reemphasized that planned and reactive agility are separate physical qualities. Reactive agility discriminated between the semiprofessional and amateur basketball players; planned agility did not. To distinguish between male basketball players of different ability levels, agility tests should include a perceptual and decision-making component.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
74
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, COD-G and AG-G improved significantly in the 15m SS performance (the improvement ranged from 2.18% to 10.23%). Data from the present study were in line with previous studies [15, 23] reporting a significant improvement in straight sprint time performance following AG/COD training, indicating a possible training transfer between these physical qualities [23, 30]. The improvement in sprinting performance after AG and COD training could be partly explained by the improvement in leg extensor power and the ability to produce lower limb force more efficiently after training, as previously reported [31, 32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Indeed, COD-G and AG-G improved significantly in the 15m SS performance (the improvement ranged from 2.18% to 10.23%). Data from the present study were in line with previous studies [15, 23] reporting a significant improvement in straight sprint time performance following AG/COD training, indicating a possible training transfer between these physical qualities [23, 30]. The improvement in sprinting performance after AG and COD training could be partly explained by the improvement in leg extensor power and the ability to produce lower limb force more efficiently after training, as previously reported [31, 32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is important to recognize that agility performance has been considered in terms of change of direction and reactive abilities [51]. However, such a division is often considered in literature [52], with studies adopting protocols like the T-test [53], the Y-shaped test [54], the Reactive Agility Test [55] and IAT [16] for measuring agility indistinguishable. Apart from its analysis in terms of the performance aspect, Chelladurai [15] classifies agility as simple, temporal, spatial and universal in understanding specific sports' demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies comparing the ability to perform COD exercise in basketball players of different competitive levels reported conflicting results. [6][7][8][9][10][11] In the present study, we proposed a novel application for the objective quantification of peripheral fatigue induced by repeated CODs. The peripheral fatigue and PTmax of the knee extensor muscles measured during the MCODE were partially affected by the competitive level of play.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 While the physiological characteristics of basketball players have received considerable attention over the past years, 2 only few studies have compared the COD ability and the ability to sustain repeated COD efforts of adult players competing at different levels. [6][7][8][9][10][11] COD exercises were found to discriminate professional and semi-professional adult male basketball players from their lower level counterparts, 7,10,11 while professional players (division I vs division II) appeared to be characterized by a similar COD ability. 8,9 However, some limitations of these previous studies should be acknowledged, such as the limited number of players involved and only two competitive level groups compared in each study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%