2014
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201330416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planar and 3D interdigitated electrodes for biosensing applications: The impact of a dielectric barrier on the sensor properties

Abstract: Planar and three‐dimensional (3D) interdigitated electrodes (IDE) with electrode digits separated by an insulating barrier of different heights were electrochemically characterized and compared in terms of their sensing properties. Due to the impact of the surface resistance, both types of IDE structures display a non‐linear behavior in low‐ionic strength solutions. The experimental data were fitted to an electrical equivalent circuit and interpreted taking into account the surface‐charge‐governed properties. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(56 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it becomes obvious that the adsorption of positively charged PEI on the negatively charged BST sensor surface noticeably affects the real part of the impedance decreasing its value, e.g., by 17% at 1 Hz. Similar effect has been observed by PEI adsorption on the 3D‐IDE sensor without a protective layer and has been explained by the model based on the superimposition of the bulk and surface conductance .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…On the other hand, it becomes obvious that the adsorption of positively charged PEI on the negatively charged BST sensor surface noticeably affects the real part of the impedance decreasing its value, e.g., by 17% at 1 Hz. Similar effect has been observed by PEI adsorption on the 3D‐IDE sensor without a protective layer and has been explained by the model based on the superimposition of the bulk and surface conductance .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Potential sources of error are the electrode height and the electrolyte complexity. Bäcker et al [ 51 ] compared planar and 3D IME for sensing and expanded on this basic model by considering a dielectric barrier between the electrode fingers. This approach offers potential improvement of the dielectric field if the geometry can support controlled immobilization of aptamer for promoting cell capture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method requires redox couples to observe the changes, which makes it unsuitable for point-of-care measurements [ 9 ]. The non-faradaic (capacitive) method involves the passivation of the electrode, which eliminates the need for a redox couple to generate a signal, and measures the change in capacitance [ 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%