Plagiarism Among Junior Lecturers in Indonesia: How and Why?

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Lecturers of public universities in Indonesia are encouraged to publish articles in internationally reputable journals frequently. Due to their workload and tight schedule, they may be tempted to copy some or part of their works. This study aimed at investigating the reasons for young lecturers on plagiarism in English academic writing.
 Methodology: A quantitative method was used to describe and explain the phenomenon of the junior lecturers’ plagiaristic conduct. A set of questionnaires was used as the instrument to obtain the data. The data were collected from 82 young lecturers who were attending an English intensive program at the Language Centre of Syiah Kuala University, the oldest and biggest university in the province of Aceh.
 Main Findings: The results show a contradiction between junior lecturers’ awareness of their practical behavior. Their high awareness of plagiarism was not a benchmark from the misconduct or plagiarism. Surprisingly, the findings show some of the junior lecturers were intentionally plagiarizing by paying more professional writers to finish their articles. They also copied the whole source or part of it to produce better writing work. Finally, lack of consequences and lack of ability in academic writing are the major reasons why young lecturers plagiarized.
 Applications of this study: This study applies to the area of English Teaching and Learning. However, it does not rule out the possibility that the study result applies to other fields of study.
 Novelty/Originality of this study: Moreover, the study result might be useful for readers’ conceptual development because there is very little research related to lecturers’ plagiaristic behavior, especially in Indonesia. A more in-depth investigation can be obtained and tested using this study result.

A Legal Perspective on Academic Plagiarism of Research Writing in Malaysian Universities

“…Referring to Indonesia as one of the countries facing the same problem (Aziz et al, 2020), the government there has taken a few initiatives where their Education Ministry introduces abundant of policies following the ANES 2003 as the national policy. Among others, the National Education of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation, Number 17, 2010 on Prevention and Mitigation of Plagiarism in Higher Education (RPMPHE 2010), circular letters, ethical or honor codes and guidelines.…”

“…First of all, plagiarism itself has many definitions depending on the countries and between the authors of the previous articles (Aziz et al, 2020). For example, in its chapter I, article 1, unit 1, the Indonesian laws defined plagiarism as an act that either direct or indirect attempt to obtain credits or marks from a research paper by copying others' work, either explicitly or implicitly, and presenting it as one's own without properly and adequately citing the source (Akbar & Picard, 2019;RPMPHE 2010).…”

Language Education and Artificial Intelligence: An Exploration of Challenges Confronting Academics in Global South Universities

“…One must also note that while AI-powered technologies are designed to make tasks more efficient, they are not designed to be creative (Omari et al, 2022), thus, students and lecturers who rely solely on these tools may fail to develop their creativity, which is an essential aspect of learning (Sharma et al, 2022). Because AI technologies can only perform specific tasks that they are programmed to do, their scope is sometimes limited, and this can lead to a lack of diversity in the types of assignments and projects that students and lecturers undertake (Aziz & Silfiani, 2020;Gallacher et al, 2021). As such, those who overly rely on AI-powered tools may not explore different approaches to problem-solving or develop innovative ideas.…”