2021
DOI: 10.1007/s43545-021-00285-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place-based modelling of social vulnerability to COVID-19 in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SVI has been validated and adapted in different parts of the world, such as Botswana [16] and China [17]. In the case of COVID19, it was used in Nigeria [18] and the United States, showing its adaptability to different contexts, and its ability to help authorities allocate adequate resources [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SVI has been validated and adapted in different parts of the world, such as Botswana [16] and China [17]. In the case of COVID19, it was used in Nigeria [18] and the United States, showing its adaptability to different contexts, and its ability to help authorities allocate adequate resources [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies [ 9 , 23 , 28 ] used individual vulnerability indicator scores directly rather than constructing a composite vulnerability index. Of the 38 studies that constructed a composite vulnerability index, 16 used percentile-rank methods (eg, the CDC’s SVI) [ 4 - 7 , 12 , 22 , 25 , 26 , 29 , 30 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 41 , 44 , 51 ] which assumed equal contribution of the chosen indicators and components to the overall vulnerability, 11 used principal component analysis (PCA) or factor analysis [ 11 , 32 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 43 , 47 - 49 , 52 ] to explore main components of vulnerability from the chosen indicators and assign weights to each component regarding their contribution to the overall vulnerability, two [ 39 , 42 ] directly summed the indicator scores, and two [ 31 , 50 ] used the more sophisticated methods (ie, machine learning, generalized propensity modelling) to generate an overall vulnerability index. Thirteen studies provided insufficient justifications about the chosen statistical methods used to examine the associations between the vulnerability levels and health-related outcomes, and nine [ 6 , 11 , 14 , 24 , 31 , 37 , 39 , 42 , 48 ] only examined their univariate correlations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-six of the 29 studies reporting the associations of a composite vulnerability index with measures of cumulative COVID-19 morbidity reported a significant association between the two [4][5][6]10,11,15,[22][23][24][25][26][27][32][33][34][35][36][37]39,40,[42][43][44]48,49,52]. Three studies reported that COVID-19 cases or incidence rates initially rapidly increased in less vulnerable communities, but eventually became more widespread in more vulnerable communities [7,32,41].…”
Section: Associations Of Community Vulnerability Levels With Covid-19...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach was used by Decuir et al [ 29 ] and Singh [ 30 ] to create area economic deprivation indices (analyzed in association with high-risk drug injection behaviors and mortality inequalities, respectively). It was also used by Frank et al [ 31 ] to create a neighborhood walkability index, and by Lawal & Osayomi [ 32 ] in their creation of an index of place characteristics deemed to confer social vulnerability to COVID-19 in Nigeria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%