2004
Pitfalls of Converting Practice Guidelines Into Quality Measures
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
151
33
12
2
Citation Types
0
140
1
1
Year Published
2000
2025
Publication Types
Select...
177
7
6
Relationship
7
183
Authors
Journals
Cited by 190 publications
(142 citation statements)
References 23 publications
0
140
1
1
“…Although patient and medical exceptions to preventive health services are perceived to be common in clinical practice, they were uncommon in this study and did not affect performance significantly. Patient refusal rates in this study were lower than those reported in other studies for pneumococcal vaccination 26,27 and colorectal cancer screening 28,29 and may underestimate the true frequency. However, they approximate those reported in a similarly designed CDS reminder study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Although patient and medical exceptions to preventive health services are perceived to be common in clinical practice, they were uncommon in this study and did not affect performance significantly. Patient refusal rates in this study were lower than those reported in other studies for pneumococcal vaccination 26,27 and colorectal cancer screening 28,29 and may underestimate the true frequency. However, they approximate those reported in a similarly designed CDS reminder study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…The experience of the clinicians who feel pressure to modify their practice based on their exposure to clinical reminders and quality measures supports efforts for modifying these metrics for persons with multiple conditions 28. The concerns expressed by the primary care clinicians in this study that their subspecialist colleagues may not consider the wider harms and benefits of organ-specific intervention reflect the fragmentation of care for patients who receive care from many physicians for their multiple conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These programs have been criticized by some as encouraging a one-size-fits-all approach to care. 37,38 We found that medical centers are uniformly not targeting screening according to life expectancy, regardless of performance measures or whether a center has a high or low overall screening rate. Not only do high screening VAs screen many men with limited life expectancy who should not be screened, but centers screening few men with limited life expectancy also screen few men with favorable life expectancy, for whom some guidelines recommend screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
